Abstract
Livingstone et al. presented evidence for a defect of the magnocellular visual processing stream in developmental dyslexia. They reported diminished visual evoked potentials (VEP) to low-contrast, rapid checkerboard reversal patterns in the dyslexics. We attempted to replicate this effect using transient and steady-state VEPs to checkerboard reversal stimuli in a group of adult developmental dyslexics. Several different reversal rates and contrast levels were utilized. No differences were found between the dyslexic and control groups for the low-contrast, rapidly reversing patterns, nor for any combination of stimulus rate or contrast that was tested. Thus, these findings do not support a magnocellular processing deficit in developmental dyslexia.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Neuropsychologia |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue number | 11 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1123-1127 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| ISSN | 0028-3932 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 01.01.1996 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Research Areas and Centers
- Academic Focus: Center for Brain, Behavior and Metabolism (CBBM)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Developmental dyslexia: Passive visual stimulation provides no evidence for a magnocellular processing defect'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver