Developmental dyslexia: Passive visual stimulation provides no evidence for a magnocellular processing defect

Sönke Johannes*, Clifton L. Kussmaul, Thomas F. Münte, George R. Mangun

*Corresponding author for this work
73 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Livingstone et al. presented evidence for a defect of the magnocellular visual processing stream in developmental dyslexia. They reported diminished visual evoked potentials (VEP) to low-contrast, rapid checkerboard reversal patterns in the dyslexics. We attempted to replicate this effect using transient and steady-state VEPs to checkerboard reversal stimuli in a group of adult developmental dyslexics. Several different reversal rates and contrast levels were utilized. No differences were found between the dyslexic and control groups for the low-contrast, rapidly reversing patterns, nor for any combination of stimulus rate or contrast that was tested. Thus, these findings do not support a magnocellular processing deficit in developmental dyslexia.

Original languageEnglish
JournalNeuropsychologia
Volume34
Issue number11
Pages (from-to)1123-1127
Number of pages5
ISSN0028-3932
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.01.1996

Research Areas and Centers

  • Academic Focus: Center for Brain, Behavior and Metabolism (CBBM)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Developmental dyslexia: Passive visual stimulation provides no evidence for a magnocellular processing defect'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this