TY - JOUR
T1 - Development and validation of a paediatric long-bone fracture classification. A prospective multicentre study in 13 European paediatric trauma centres
AU - Schneidmüller, Dorien
AU - Röder, Christoph
AU - Kraus, Ralf
AU - Marzi, Ingo
AU - Kaiser, Martin
AU - Dietrich, Daniel
AU - Von Laer, Lutz
PY - 2011/1/1
Y1 - 2011/1/1
N2 - Background: The aim of this study was to develop a child-specific classification system for long bone fractures and to examine its reliability and validity on the basis of a prospective multicentre study. Methods. Using the sequentially developed classification system, three samples of between 30 and 185 paediatric limb fractures from a pool of 2308 fractures documented in two multicenter studies were analysed in a blinded fashion by eight orthopaedic surgeons, on a total of 5 occasions. Intra- and interobserver reliability and accuracy were calculated. Results: The reliability improved with successive simplification of the classification. The final version resulted in an overall interobserver agreement of = 0.71 with no significant difference between experienced and less experienced raters. Conclusions: In conclusion, the evaluation of the newly proposed classification system resulted in a reliable and routinely applicable system, for which training in its proper use may further improve the reliability. It can be recommended as a useful tool for clinical practice and offers the option for developing treatment recommendations and outcome predictions in the future.
AB - Background: The aim of this study was to develop a child-specific classification system for long bone fractures and to examine its reliability and validity on the basis of a prospective multicentre study. Methods. Using the sequentially developed classification system, three samples of between 30 and 185 paediatric limb fractures from a pool of 2308 fractures documented in two multicenter studies were analysed in a blinded fashion by eight orthopaedic surgeons, on a total of 5 occasions. Intra- and interobserver reliability and accuracy were calculated. Results: The reliability improved with successive simplification of the classification. The final version resulted in an overall interobserver agreement of = 0.71 with no significant difference between experienced and less experienced raters. Conclusions: In conclusion, the evaluation of the newly proposed classification system resulted in a reliable and routinely applicable system, for which training in its proper use may further improve the reliability. It can be recommended as a useful tool for clinical practice and offers the option for developing treatment recommendations and outcome predictions in the future.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955658923&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/1471-2474-12-89
DO - 10.1186/1471-2474-12-89
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 21548939
AN - SCOPUS:79955658923
SN - 1471-2474
VL - 12
JO - BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
JF - BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
M1 - 89
ER -