Development and evaluation of evidence-based patient information handbooks about multiple sclerosis immunotherapies

A. Schneider*, E. Fasshauer, J. Scheiderbauer, C. Warnke, S. Köpke, J. Kasper, M. Toussaint, H. Temmes, B. Hemmer, I. Schiffmann, A. C. Rahn, C. Heesen

*Corresponding author for this work
3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Multiple sclerosis treatment options are increasing. Evidence-based patient information (EBPI) are therefore crucial to enable patient involvement in decision making. Based on earlier work on decision support, patient information handbooks on 8 MS immunotherapies were developed, piloted and evaluated with support from the German Clinical Competence Network MS and the German MS Society. Methods: Handbooks were structured according to EBPI concepts. Drafts were commented by patient representatives and neurologists with an MS expertise. Executive boards of the German MS Society and the Competence Network as well as pharmaceutical companies’ feedback was included. Handbooks were distributed among MS neurologists by the German MS Society. Evaluation followed applying a mixed methods approach with interviews, focus groups and surveys. One survey addressed persons with MS (pwMS) based on a questionnaire included in each handbook. Neurologists who received printed patient handbooks were invited to give feedback in a second survey. Results: Eight handbooks were developed providing absolute and relative risk information in numbers and figures as well as monitoring needs and drug fact boxes. Despite the high amount of information and the display of low absolute risk reduction rates of treatments, handbooks were overall appreciated by pwMS (n=107) and mostly also by physicians (n=24). For more than 70% of the pwMS the information was new, understandable and supportive for decision making. But patients felt uncomfortable with relative risk information. However, response rates in the evaluation were low, exposing the challenges when implementing EBPI into clinical care. Therefore, conclusions must be considered preliminarily. Conclusion: EBPI on immunotherapies for MS seem feasible and are appreciated by patients and treating neurologists but more implementation research is needed.

Original languageEnglish
Article number103728
JournalMultiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
Volume60
ISSN2211-0348
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 04.2022

Funding

The DECIMS-project was funded by the German Ministry of Research and Education. Graphical work, layout and printing was enabled by AOK Bundesverband, Barmer, BKK Dachverband, KKH Kaufmännische Krankenkasse. C. Warnke has received institutional honoraria and/or grant support from Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Alexion, Janssen, Merck, Biogen, and Roche. We thank all authors of physician's handbooks for proofreading as well as the executive board of KKNMS and DMSG for commentaries. We thank M. M?urer for critical reading and commenting of the manuscript. Special thanks to C. Borsanyi and L. Hochmair from the KKNMS secretary, S. Hartmann and I. Backhus from INIMS and I. Teschner from the DMSG secretary for editorial assistance. We thank G. Fuchs, ?Fuchs-Design?, for providing graphical work.

Research Areas and Centers

  • Research Area: Center for Population Medicine and Public Health (ZBV)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Development and evaluation of evidence-based patient information handbooks about multiple sclerosis immunotherapies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this