Der initiale Interaktionsstil als Moderator des Therapieerfolgs des Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy und der Metakognitiven Therapie

Anne Katharina Tielking; Svenja Sürig; Sarah Glanert; Stefan Borgwardt; Jan Philipp Klein

Der initiale Interaktionsstil als Moderator des Therapieerfolgs des Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy und der Metakognitiven Therapie

Translated title of the contribution: THE INITIAL INTERPERSONAL STYLE AS A MODERATOR OF TREATMENT OUTCOME IN THE COGNITIVE BEHAVIORAL ANALYSIS SYSTEM OF PSYCHOTHERAPY AND THE METACOGNITIVE THERAPY

Anne Katharina Tielking, Svenja Sürig, Sarah Glanert, Stefan Borgwardt, Jan Philipp Klein

Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapie

Abstract

AIMS: The aim was to determine whether interpersonal aspects influence the success of the Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) versus the Metacognitive Therapy (MCT). METHODS: In this naturalistic study, we applied the IMI-R and the LQPT-SF to measure pre-interventional interpersonal skills. A Change Score of the QIDS-SR₁₆ was calculated as an indicator of treatment success. In the main analysis we examined 85 patients (34 CBASP; 51 MCT). RESULTS: Treatment with CBASP and MCT led to a significant reduction in the depressive symptomatology. Subjects with marked pre-interventional hostile-submissive behavior yielded lower treatment success in CBASP as compared to subjects initially scoring low in hostile-sub- missiveness. The mentioned parameter value had no influence on treatment success in MCT. CONCLUSIONS: If the results are replicable, it would imply that patients with a predominantly hostile-submissive interaction style should rather be offered MCT than CBASP.

Translated title of the contribution	THE INITIAL INTERPERSONAL STYLE AS A MODERATOR OF TREATMENT OUTCOME IN THE COGNITIVE BEHAVIORAL ANALYSIS SYSTEM OF PSYCHOTHERAPY AND THE METACOGNITIVE THERAPY
Original language	German
Journal	Verhaltenstherapie und Verhaltensmedizin
Volume	43
Issue number	3-4
Pages (from-to)	275-293
Number of pages	19
ISSN	1013-1973
Publication status	Published - 2022

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities

Research Areas and Centers

Academic Focus: Center for Brain, Behavior and Metabolism (CBBM)

DFG Research Classification Scheme

2.23-10 Clinical Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

Cite this

@article{5cacc1fba83d4b2bb6f928db0a706dc4,

title = "Der initiale Interaktionsstil als Moderator des Therapieerfolgs des Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy und der Metakognitiven Therapie",

abstract = "AIMS: The aim was to determine whether interpersonal aspects influence the success of the Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) versus the Metacognitive Therapy (MCT). METHODS: In this naturalistic study, we applied the IMI-R and the LQPT-SF to measure pre-interventional interpersonal skills. A Change Score of the QIDS-SR16 was calculated as an indicator of treatment success. In the main analysis we examined 85 patients (34 CBASP; 51 MCT). RESULTS: Treatment with CBASP and MCT led to a significant reduction in the depressive symptomatology. Subjects with marked pre-interventional hostile-submissive behavior yielded lower treatment success in CBASP as compared to subjects initially scoring low in hostile-sub- missiveness. The mentioned parameter value had no influence on treatment success in MCT. CONCLUSIONS: If the results are replicable, it would imply that patients with a predominantly hostile-submissive interaction style should rather be offered MCT than CBASP.",

author = "Tielking, \{Anne Katharina\} and Svenja S{\"u}rig and Sarah Glanert and Stefan Borgwardt and Klein, \{Jan Philipp\}",

year = "2022",

language = "Deutsch",

volume = "43",

pages = "275--293",

journal = "Verhaltenstherapie und Verhaltensmedizin",

issn = "1013-1973",

publisher = "Pabst Science Publishers",

number = "3-4",

}

Der initiale Interaktionsstil als Moderator des Therapieerfolgs des Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy und der Metakognitiven Therapie. / Tielking, Anne Katharina; Sürig, Svenja; Glanert, Sarah et al.
In: Verhaltenstherapie und Verhaltensmedizin, Vol. 43, No. 3-4, 2022, p. 275-293.

Research output: Journal Articles › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Der initiale Interaktionsstil als Moderator des Therapieerfolgs des Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy und der Metakognitiven Therapie

AU - Tielking, Anne Katharina

AU - Sürig, Svenja

AU - Glanert, Sarah

AU - Borgwardt, Stefan

AU - Klein, Jan Philipp

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - AIMS: The aim was to determine whether interpersonal aspects influence the success of the Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) versus the Metacognitive Therapy (MCT). METHODS: In this naturalistic study, we applied the IMI-R and the LQPT-SF to measure pre-interventional interpersonal skills. A Change Score of the QIDS-SR16 was calculated as an indicator of treatment success. In the main analysis we examined 85 patients (34 CBASP; 51 MCT). RESULTS: Treatment with CBASP and MCT led to a significant reduction in the depressive symptomatology. Subjects with marked pre-interventional hostile-submissive behavior yielded lower treatment success in CBASP as compared to subjects initially scoring low in hostile-sub- missiveness. The mentioned parameter value had no influence on treatment success in MCT. CONCLUSIONS: If the results are replicable, it would imply that patients with a predominantly hostile-submissive interaction style should rather be offered MCT than CBASP.

AB - AIMS: The aim was to determine whether interpersonal aspects influence the success of the Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) versus the Metacognitive Therapy (MCT). METHODS: In this naturalistic study, we applied the IMI-R and the LQPT-SF to measure pre-interventional interpersonal skills. A Change Score of the QIDS-SR16 was calculated as an indicator of treatment success. In the main analysis we examined 85 patients (34 CBASP; 51 MCT). RESULTS: Treatment with CBASP and MCT led to a significant reduction in the depressive symptomatology. Subjects with marked pre-interventional hostile-submissive behavior yielded lower treatment success in CBASP as compared to subjects initially scoring low in hostile-sub- missiveness. The mentioned parameter value had no influence on treatment success in MCT. CONCLUSIONS: If the results are replicable, it would imply that patients with a predominantly hostile-submissive interaction style should rather be offered MCT than CBASP.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85178198867

M3 - Zeitschriftenaufsätze

AN - SCOPUS:85178198867

SN - 1013-1973

VL - 43

SP - 275

EP - 293

JO - Verhaltenstherapie und Verhaltensmedizin

JF - Verhaltenstherapie und Verhaltensmedizin

IS - 3-4

ER -

Der initiale Interaktionsstil als Moderator des Therapieerfolgs des Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy und der Metakognitiven Therapie

Abstract

UN SDGs

Research Areas and Centers

DFG Research Classification Scheme

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this