Conventional transarterial chemoembolization versus drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Roman Kloeckner; Arndt Weinmann; Friederike Prinz; Daniel Pinto dos Santos; Christian Ruckes; Christoph Dueber; Michael Bernhard Pitton

doi:10.1186/s12885-015-1480-x

Conventional transarterial chemoembolization versus drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Roman Kloeckner, Arndt Weinmann, Friederike Prinz, Daniel Pinto dos Santos, Christian Ruckes, Christoph Dueber, Michael Bernhard Pitton

Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To compare the overall survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who were treated with lipiodol-based conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) with that of patients treated with drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE).

METHODS: By an electronic search of our radiology information system, we identified 674 patients that received TACE between November 2002 and July 2013. A total of 520 patients received cTACE, and 154 received DEB-TACE. In total, 424 patients were excluded for the following reasons: tumor type other than HCC (n=91), liver transplantation after TACE (n=119), lack of histological grading (n=58), incomplete laboratory values (n=15), other reasons (e.g., previous systemic chemotherapy) (n=114), or were lost to follow-up (n=27). Therefore, 250 patients were finally included for comparative analysis (n=174 cTACE; n=76 DEB-TACE).

RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding sex, overall status (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification), liver function (Child-Pugh), portal invasion, tumor load, or tumor grading (all p>0.05). The mean number of treatment sessions was 4±3.1 in the cTACE group versus 2.9±1.8 in the DEB-TACE group (p=0.01). Median survival was 409 days (95% CI: 321-488 days) in the cTACE group, compared with 369 days (95% CI: 310-589 days) in the DEB-TACE group (p=0.76). In the subgroup of Child A patients, the survival was 602 days (484-792 days) for cTACE versus 627 days (364-788 days) for DEB-TACE (p=0.39). In Child B/C patients, the survival was considerably lower: 223 days (165-315 days) for cTACE versus 226 days (114-335 days) for DEB-TACE (p=0.53).

CONCLUSION: The present study showed no significant difference in overall survival between cTACE and DEB-TACE in patients with HCC. However, the significantly lower number of treatments needed in the DEB-TACE group makes it a more appealing treatment option than cTACE for appropriately selected patients with unresectable HCC.

Original language	English
Journal	BMC Cancer
Volume	15
Pages (from-to)	465
ISSN	1471-2407
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1480-x
Publication status	Published - 10.06.2015

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1186/s12885-015-1480-x

Cite this

@article{86d8802c0d9c4d3c800e8bf05fab8858,

title = "Conventional transarterial chemoembolization versus drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma",

abstract = "BACKGROUND: To compare the overall survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who were treated with lipiodol-based conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) with that of patients treated with drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE).METHODS: By an electronic search of our radiology information system, we identified 674 patients that received TACE between November 2002 and July 2013. A total of 520 patients received cTACE, and 154 received DEB-TACE. In total, 424 patients were excluded for the following reasons: tumor type other than HCC (n=91), liver transplantation after TACE (n=119), lack of histological grading (n=58), incomplete laboratory values (n=15), other reasons (e.g., previous systemic chemotherapy) (n=114), or were lost to follow-up (n=27). Therefore, 250 patients were finally included for comparative analysis (n=174 cTACE; n=76 DEB-TACE).RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding sex, overall status (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification), liver function (Child-Pugh), portal invasion, tumor load, or tumor grading (all p>0.05). The mean number of treatment sessions was 4±3.1 in the cTACE group versus 2.9±1.8 in the DEB-TACE group (p=0.01). Median survival was 409 days (95% CI: 321-488 days) in the cTACE group, compared with 369 days (95% CI: 310-589 days) in the DEB-TACE group (p=0.76). In the subgroup of Child A patients, the survival was 602 days (484-792 days) for cTACE versus 627 days (364-788 days) for DEB-TACE (p=0.39). In Child B/C patients, the survival was considerably lower: 223 days (165-315 days) for cTACE versus 226 days (114-335 days) for DEB-TACE (p=0.53).CONCLUSION: The present study showed no significant difference in overall survival between cTACE and DEB-TACE in patients with HCC. However, the significantly lower number of treatments needed in the DEB-TACE group makes it a more appealing treatment option than cTACE for appropriately selected patients with unresectable HCC.",

author = "Roman Kloeckner and Arndt Weinmann and Friederike Prinz and {Pinto dos Santos}, Daniel and Christian Ruckes and Christoph Dueber and Pitton, {Michael Bernhard}",

year = "2015",

month = jun,

day = "10",

doi = "10.1186/s12885-015-1480-x",

language = "English",

volume = "15",

pages = "465",

journal = "BMC Cancer",

issn = "1471-2407",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conventional transarterial chemoembolization versus drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

AU - Kloeckner, Roman

AU - Weinmann, Arndt

AU - Prinz, Friederike

AU - Pinto dos Santos, Daniel

AU - Ruckes, Christian

AU - Dueber, Christoph

AU - Pitton, Michael Bernhard

PY - 2015/6/10

Y1 - 2015/6/10

N2 - BACKGROUND: To compare the overall survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who were treated with lipiodol-based conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) with that of patients treated with drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE).METHODS: By an electronic search of our radiology information system, we identified 674 patients that received TACE between November 2002 and July 2013. A total of 520 patients received cTACE, and 154 received DEB-TACE. In total, 424 patients were excluded for the following reasons: tumor type other than HCC (n=91), liver transplantation after TACE (n=119), lack of histological grading (n=58), incomplete laboratory values (n=15), other reasons (e.g., previous systemic chemotherapy) (n=114), or were lost to follow-up (n=27). Therefore, 250 patients were finally included for comparative analysis (n=174 cTACE; n=76 DEB-TACE).RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding sex, overall status (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification), liver function (Child-Pugh), portal invasion, tumor load, or tumor grading (all p>0.05). The mean number of treatment sessions was 4±3.1 in the cTACE group versus 2.9±1.8 in the DEB-TACE group (p=0.01). Median survival was 409 days (95% CI: 321-488 days) in the cTACE group, compared with 369 days (95% CI: 310-589 days) in the DEB-TACE group (p=0.76). In the subgroup of Child A patients, the survival was 602 days (484-792 days) for cTACE versus 627 days (364-788 days) for DEB-TACE (p=0.39). In Child B/C patients, the survival was considerably lower: 223 days (165-315 days) for cTACE versus 226 days (114-335 days) for DEB-TACE (p=0.53).CONCLUSION: The present study showed no significant difference in overall survival between cTACE and DEB-TACE in patients with HCC. However, the significantly lower number of treatments needed in the DEB-TACE group makes it a more appealing treatment option than cTACE for appropriately selected patients with unresectable HCC.

AB - BACKGROUND: To compare the overall survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who were treated with lipiodol-based conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) with that of patients treated with drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE).METHODS: By an electronic search of our radiology information system, we identified 674 patients that received TACE between November 2002 and July 2013. A total of 520 patients received cTACE, and 154 received DEB-TACE. In total, 424 patients were excluded for the following reasons: tumor type other than HCC (n=91), liver transplantation after TACE (n=119), lack of histological grading (n=58), incomplete laboratory values (n=15), other reasons (e.g., previous systemic chemotherapy) (n=114), or were lost to follow-up (n=27). Therefore, 250 patients were finally included for comparative analysis (n=174 cTACE; n=76 DEB-TACE).RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding sex, overall status (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification), liver function (Child-Pugh), portal invasion, tumor load, or tumor grading (all p>0.05). The mean number of treatment sessions was 4±3.1 in the cTACE group versus 2.9±1.8 in the DEB-TACE group (p=0.01). Median survival was 409 days (95% CI: 321-488 days) in the cTACE group, compared with 369 days (95% CI: 310-589 days) in the DEB-TACE group (p=0.76). In the subgroup of Child A patients, the survival was 602 days (484-792 days) for cTACE versus 627 days (364-788 days) for DEB-TACE (p=0.39). In Child B/C patients, the survival was considerably lower: 223 days (165-315 days) for cTACE versus 226 days (114-335 days) for DEB-TACE (p=0.53).CONCLUSION: The present study showed no significant difference in overall survival between cTACE and DEB-TACE in patients with HCC. However, the significantly lower number of treatments needed in the DEB-TACE group makes it a more appealing treatment option than cTACE for appropriately selected patients with unresectable HCC.

U2 - 10.1186/s12885-015-1480-x

DO - 10.1186/s12885-015-1480-x

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 26059447

SN - 1471-2407

VL - 15

SP - 465

JO - BMC Cancer

JF - BMC Cancer

ER -