Controversies in axillary management of patients with breast cancer - updates for 2024

Nikolas Tauber, Vesna Bjelic-Radisic, Marc Thill, Maggie Banys-Paluchowski*

*Corresponding author for this work
5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose of reviewFor some time now, the question of de-escalation in axillary staging in breast cancer patients has been raised. The aim is to improve the patients' quality of life and reduce morbidity by optimizing surgical strategies with a high level of oncological safety. This review offers a current overview of published evidence and clinical practice, aiming to guide the surgical community as they reassess and reshape their practices.Recent findingsYears after introducing sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in clinically node negative breast cancer patients several guidelines suggest completely omitting SLNB in older patients with low-risk tumors. It is worth noting that for patients with a metastatic sentinel lymph node in the upfront surgery setting, a de-escalation of axillary surgery may in fact lead to an escalation of radiation therapy. Currently, there is limited evidence on the axillary surgical approach for patients with initially positive node status achieving complete axillary response (ycN0), resulting in heterogenous guideline recommendations.SummaryInnovative trials are contributing to a growing evidence on de-escalation of axillary surgery with the aim of reducing arm morbidity and improving long-term health-related quality of life.

Original languageEnglish
JournalCurrent Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume36
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)51-56
Number of pages6
ISSN1040-872X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.02.2024

Research Areas and Centers

  • Research Area: Luebeck Integrated Oncology Network (LION)

DFG Research Classification Scheme

  • 2.22-14 Hematology, Oncology
  • 2.22-21 Gynaecology and Obstetrics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Controversies in axillary management of patients with breast cancer - updates for 2024'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this