Abstract
For anonymous communication networks (ACNs), Das et al. recently confirmed a long-suspected trilemma result that ACNs cannot achieve strong anonymity, low latency overhead and low bandwidth overhead at the same time. Our paper emanates from the careful observation that their analysis does not include a relevant class of ACNs with what we call user coordination where users proactively work together towards improving their anonymity. We show that such protocols can achieve better anonymity than predicted by the above trilemma result. As the main contribution, we present a stronger impossibility result that includes all ACNs we are aware of. Along with our formal analysis, we provide intuitive interpretations and lessons learned. Finally, we demonstrate qualitatively stricter requirements for the Anytrust assumption (all but one protocol party is compromised) prevalent across ACNs.
| Original language | German |
|---|---|
| Journal | Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies |
| Volume | 2020 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Pages (from-to) | 356-383 |
| Number of pages | 28 |
| ISSN | 2299-0984 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2020 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
-
SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver