Comparison of two methods to assess transdiaphragmatic pressure at different levels of work of breathing

K. Lopez-Navas; S. Brandt; M. Strutz; H. Gehring; U. Wenkebach

doi:10.1515/bmt-2012-4124

Comparison of two methods to assess transdiaphragmatic pressure at different levels of work of breathing

K. Lopez-Navas, S. Brandt, M. Strutz, H. Gehring, U. Wenkebach

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine

Laboratory of Medical Systems

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A standard way to assess patient's work of breathing is the calculation of the inspiratory pressure-time-product (PTPinsp) which requires knowledge of the transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi). We designed the Occlusion+Delta (O+D) method to assess Pdi non-invasively. For its validation we compared PTPinsp from the proposed assessment (rPdi) and from Pdi measured with an invasively introduced gastro-oesophageal balloon catheter, giving especial attention to differences related to the defined levels of effort.

Original language	English
Journal	Biomedizinische Technik
Volume	57
Issue number	SUPPL. 1 TRACK-K
Pages (from-to)	937-940
Number of pages	4
ISSN	0013-5585
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2012-4124
Publication status	Published - 04.09.2012

Funding

We acknowledge the support of the European Union and the State Schleswig-Holstein (Program for the Future-Economy: 122-09-024).

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Access to Document

10.1515/bmt-2012-4124

Cite this

@article{f83dc4979b2b428a95903b09c5100812,

title = "Comparison of two methods to assess transdiaphragmatic pressure at different levels of work of breathing",

abstract = "A standard way to assess patient's work of breathing is the calculation of the inspiratory pressure-time-product (PTPinsp) which requires knowledge of the transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi). We designed the Occlusion+Delta (O+D) method to assess Pdi non-invasively. For its validation we compared PTPinsp from the proposed assessment (rPdi) and from Pdi measured with an invasively introduced gastro-oesophageal balloon catheter, giving especial attention to differences related to the defined levels of effort.",

author = "K. Lopez-Navas and S. Brandt and M. Strutz and H. Gehring and U. Wenkebach",

year = "2012",

month = sep,

day = "4",

doi = "10.1515/bmt-2012-4124",

language = "English",

volume = "57",

pages = "937--940",

journal = "Biomedizinische Technik",

issn = "0013-5585",

publisher = "Walter de Gruyter GmbH",

number = "SUPPL. 1 TRACK-K",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of two methods to assess transdiaphragmatic pressure at different levels of work of breathing

AU - Lopez-Navas, K.

AU - Brandt, S.

AU - Strutz, M.

AU - Gehring, H.

AU - Wenkebach, U.

PY - 2012/9/4

Y1 - 2012/9/4

N2 - A standard way to assess patient's work of breathing is the calculation of the inspiratory pressure-time-product (PTPinsp) which requires knowledge of the transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi). We designed the Occlusion+Delta (O+D) method to assess Pdi non-invasively. For its validation we compared PTPinsp from the proposed assessment (rPdi) and from Pdi measured with an invasively introduced gastro-oesophageal balloon catheter, giving especial attention to differences related to the defined levels of effort.

AB - A standard way to assess patient's work of breathing is the calculation of the inspiratory pressure-time-product (PTPinsp) which requires knowledge of the transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi). We designed the Occlusion+Delta (O+D) method to assess Pdi non-invasively. For its validation we compared PTPinsp from the proposed assessment (rPdi) and from Pdi measured with an invasively introduced gastro-oesophageal balloon catheter, giving especial attention to differences related to the defined levels of effort.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84899926148

U2 - 10.1515/bmt-2012-4124

DO - 10.1515/bmt-2012-4124

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:84899926148

SN - 0013-5585

VL - 57

SP - 937

EP - 940

JO - Biomedizinische Technik

JF - Biomedizinische Technik

IS - SUPPL. 1 TRACK-K

ER -

Comparison of two methods to assess transdiaphragmatic pressure at different levels of work of breathing

Abstract

Funding

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this