Comparison of cornea module and dermainspect for noninvasive imaging of ocular surface pathologies

Philipp Steven*, Gereon Hüttmann, Christian Rose, Norbert Koop, Maya Müller

*Corresponding author for this work
20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Minimally invasive imaging of ocular surface pathologies aims at securing clinical diagnosis without actual tissue probing. For this matter, confocal microscopy (Cornea Module) is in daily use in ophthalmic practice. Multiphoton microscopy is a new optical technique that enables high-resolution imaging and functional analysis of living tissues based on tissue autofluorescence. This study was set up to compare the potential of a multiphoton microscope (DermaInspect) to the Cornea Module. Ocular surface pathologies such as pterygia, papillomae, and nevi were investigated in vivo using the Cornea Module and imaged immediately after excision by DermaInspect. Two excitation wavelengths, fluorescence lifetime imaging and secondharmonic generation (SHG), were used to discriminate different tissue structures. Images were compared with the histopathological assessment of the samples. At wavelengths of 730 nm, multiphoton microscopy exclusively revealed cellular structures. Collagen fibrils were specifically demonstrated by second-harmonic generation. Measurements of fluorescent lifetimes enabled the highly specific detection of goblet cells, erythrocytes, and nevus-cell clusters. At the settings used, DermaInspect reaches higher resolutions than the Cornea Module and obtains additional structural information. The parallel detection of multiphoton excited autofluorescence and confocal imaging could expand the possibilities of minimally invasive investigation of the ocular surface toward functional analysis at higher resolutions.

Original languageEnglish
Article number064040
JournalJournal of Biomedical Optics
Volume14
Issue number6
ISSN1083-3668
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.12.2009

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of cornea module and dermainspect for noninvasive imaging of ocular surface pathologies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this