Comparison of clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 or non-COVID-19 community-acquired pneumonia in a prospective observational cohort study

Hans Jakob Meyer, Lukas Mödl, Olesya Unruh, Weiwei Xiang, Sarah Berger, Moritz Müller-Plathe, Gernot Rohde, Mathias W. Pletz, Jan Rupp, Norbert Suttorp, Martin Witzenrath, Thomas Zoller, Mirja Mittermaier, Fridolin Steinbeis*, study group CAPNETZ study group, R. Chen, L. Schubert, L. Traby, H. Burgmann, M. WallnerS. Stenger, A. Essig, S. Baldesberger, F. Rassouli, M. Seneghini, W. Albrich, I. Hering, D. Heigener, J. Schneider, F. Voit, J. Erber, C. Spinner, F. Waldeck, N. Käding, K. Franzen, P. Parschke, D. Drömann, J. Ankert, A. Moeser, C. Forstner, B. T. Schleenvoigt, N. Klopp, T. Illig, C. Julius, F. Eberherdt, N. Adaskina, W. Kröner, G. Barten-Neiner, M. van’t Klooster, T. Fühner, T. Welte, M. Panning, A. Grünewaldt, C. Bellinghausen, M. Kolditz, K. Popkirova, K. Prebeg, F. Hempel, M. Hower, H. Azzaui, D. Nickoleit-Bitzenberger, J. Kremling, B. Schaaf, S. Schmager, H. C. Mücke, W. Bauer, D. Stolz, M. Engelmann, A. Fuchs

*Corresponding author for this work

Abstract

Purpose: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and non-COVID-19 community-acquired pneumonia (NC-CAP) often result in hospitalization with considerable risks of mortality, ICU treatment, and long-term morbidity. A comparative analysis of clinical outcomes in COVID-19 CAP (C-CAP) and NC-CAP may improve clinical management. Methods: Using prospectively collected CAPNETZ study data (January 2017 to June 2021, 35 study centers), we conducted a comprehensive analysis of clinical outcomes including in-hospital death, ICU treatment, length of hospital stay (LOHS), 180-day survival, and post-discharge re-hospitalization rate. Logistic regression models were used to examine group differences between C-CAP and NC-CAP patients and associations with patient demography, recruitment period, comorbidity, and treatment. Results: Among 1368 patients (C-CAP: n = 344; NC-CAP: n = 1024), C-CAP showed elevated adjusted probabilities for in-hospital death (aOR 4.48 [95% CI 2.38–8.53]) and ICU treatment (aOR 8.08 [95% CI 5.31–12.52]) compared to NC-CAP. C-CAP patients were at increased risk of LOHS over seven days (aOR 1.88 [95% CI 1.47–2.42]). Although ICU patients had similar in-hospital mortality risk, C-CAP was associated with length of ICU stay over seven days (aOR 3.59 [95% CI 1.65–8.38]). Recruitment period influenced outcomes in C-CAP but not in NC-CAP. During follow-up, C-CAP was linked to a reduced risk of re-hospitalization and mortality post-discharge (aOR 0.43 [95% CI 0.27–0.70]). Conclusion: Distinct clinical trajectories of C-CAP and NC-CAP underscore the need for adapted management to avoid acute and long-term morbidity and mortality amid the evolving landscape of CAP pathogens.

Original languageEnglish
JournalInfection
Volume52
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)2359-2370
Number of pages12
ISSN0300-8126
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12.2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 or non-COVID-19 community-acquired pneumonia in a prospective observational cohort study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this