Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparison of 2.4 ghz wifi ftm-and rssi-based indoor positioning methods in realistic scenarios

Markus Bullmann*, Toni Fetzer, Frank Ebner, Markus Ebner, Frank Deinzer, Marcin Grzegorzek

*Corresponding author for this work

Abstract

With the addition of the Fine Timing Measurement (FTM) protocol in IEEE 802.11-2016, a promising sensor for smartphone-based indoor positioning systems was introduced. FTM enables a Wi-Fi device to estimate the distance to a second device based on the propagation time of the signal. Recently, FTM has gotten more attention from the scientific community as more compatible devices become available. Due to the claimed robustness and accuracy, FTM is a promising addition to the often used Received Signal Strength Indication (RSSI). In this work, we evaluate FTM on the 2.4 GHz band with 20 MHz channel bandwidth in the context of realistic indoor positioning scenarios. For this purpose, we deploy a least-squares estimation method, a probabilistic positioning approach and a simplistic particle filter implementation. Each method is evaluated using FTM and RSSI separately to show the difference of the techniques. Our results show that, although FTM achieves smaller positioning errors compared to RSSI, its error behavior is similar to RSSI. Furthermore, we demonstrate that an empirically optimized correction value for FTM is required to account for the environment. This correction value can reduce the positioning error significantly.

Original languageEnglish
Article number4515
JournalSensors (Switzerland)
Volume20
Issue number16
Pages (from-to)1-26
Number of pages26
ISSN1424-8220
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 02.08.2020

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
    SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of 2.4 ghz wifi ftm-and rssi-based indoor positioning methods in realistic scenarios'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this