Comparative analysis of label-free and 8-plex iTRAQ approach for quantitative tissue proteomic analysis

Agnieszka Latosinska, Konstantinos Vougas, Manousos Makridakis, Julie Klein, William Mullen, Mahmoud Abbas, Konstantinos Stravodimos, Ioannis Katafigiotis, Axel S. Merseburger, Jerome Zoidakis, Harald Mischak, Antonia Vlahou, Vera Jankowski

29 Citations (Scopus)


High resolution proteomics approaches have been successfully utilized for the comprehensive characterization of the cell proteome. However, in the case of quantitative proteomics an open question still remains, which quantification strategy is best suited for identification of biologically relevant changes, especially in clinical specimens. In this study, a thorough comparison of a label-free approach (intensity-based) and 8-plex iTRAQ was conducted as applied to the analysis of tumor tissue samples from non-muscle invasive and muscle-invasive bladder cancer. For the latter, two acquisition strategies were tested including analysis of unfractionated and fractioned iTRAQ-labeled peptides. To reduce variability, aliquots of the same protein extract were used as starting material, whereas to obtain representative results per method further sample processing and MS analysis were conducted according to routinely applied protocols. Considering only multiple-peptide identifications, LC-MS/MS analysis resulted in the identification of 910, 1092 and 332 proteins by label-free, fractionated and unfractionated iTRAQ, respectively. The label-free strategy provided higher protein sequence coverage compared to both iTRAQ experiments. Even though pre-fraction of the iTRAQ labeled peptides allowed for a higher number of identifications, this was not accompanied by a respective increase in the number of differentially expressed changes detected. Validity of the proteomics output related to protein identification and differential expression was determined by comparison to existing data in the field (Protein Atlas and published data on the disease). All methods predicted changes which to a large extent agreed with published data, with label-free providing a higher number of significant changes than iTRAQ. Conclusively, both label-free and iTRAQ (when combined to peptide fractionation) provide high proteome coverage and apparently valid predictions in terms of differential expression, nevertheless label-free provides higher sequence coverage and ultimately detects a higher number of differentially expressed proteins. The risk for receiving false associations still exists, particularly when analyzing highly heterogeneous biological samples, raising the need for the analysis of higher sample numbers and/or application of adjustment for multiple testing.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0137048
JournalPLoS ONE
Issue number9
Publication statusPublished - 02.09.2015


Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative analysis of label-free and 8-plex iTRAQ approach for quantitative tissue proteomic analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this