Comparative analysis of different commercial ELISA systems for the detection of anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibodies in ANCA-associated vasculitides

Julia U. Holle*, Kristine Herrmann, Wolfgang L. Gross, Elena Csernok

*Corresponding author for this work
20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To assess the diagnostic performance of 11 commercial PR3- and MPO-ANCA ELISA systems (direct, capture and high sensitive [hs] ELISA). Methods: Sera from 90 patients with AAV (GPA, MPA and CSS) and 20 disease controls (SLE; RA) and healthy individuals were tested for the presence of ANCA by IFT and by different ELISAs for the presence of PR3-and MPOANCA, respectively. Furthermore, the binding capacity of the IUIS-CDC reference sera for PR3-/MPO-ANCA in different commercial assays was analysed. Results: Commercial ELISA kits for PR3-ANCA differed moderately in their sensitivity (from 45% to 62.5%). The highest sensitivity for PR3-ANCA was obtained with hs ELISA (kit A) and capture ELISA (kit N). Testing for MPOANCA the highest sensitivity (85%) was obtained with direct ELISA (kit D and I). Specificity was high in all kits. Only three PR3-ANCA commercial kits and three MPO-ANCA kits produced binding at the expected value for the IUISCDC reference sera (100 U/ml). In all of the kits, serial dilutions of the reference sera did not yield linearity. Conclusion: Second (capture) and third (high sensitivity) generation PR3- ANCA ELISA kits are superior to conventional ELISAs. Direct and capture MPO-ANCA ELISAs showed a good overall performance in all kits. Most of the kits have not been standardised to allow their results to be compared.

Original languageEnglish
JournalClinical and Experimental Rheumatology
Volume30
Issue numberSUPPL. 70
ISSN0392-856X
Publication statusPublished - 17.07.2012

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative analysis of different commercial ELISA systems for the detection of anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibodies in ANCA-associated vasculitides'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this