TY - JOUR
T1 - CE–MS-based urinary biomarkers to distinguish non-significant from significant prostate cancer
AU - Frantzi, Maria
AU - Gomez Gomez, Enrique
AU - Blanca Pedregosa, Ana
AU - Valero Rosa, José
AU - Latosinska, Agnieszka
AU - Culig, Zoran
AU - Merseburger, Axel S.
AU - Luque, Raul M.
AU - Requena Tapia, María José
AU - Mischak, Harald
AU - Carrasco Valiente, Julia
N1 - Funding Information:
E. Gómez-Gómez thanks The Carlos III Health Institute (ISCIII) and the European Social Funds (FSE) which funds his Rio Hortega research grant contract (CM16/00180). The biological samples repository node (Córdoba, Spain) is gratefully acknowledged for coordination tasks in the selection of urine samples. Ipek Guler from the methodology department of the Maimonides Institute of Biomedical Research of Cordoba is also gratefully acknowledged for collaboration in the statistical analysis.
Funding Information:
Funding: This work was supported by The Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (MINECO) and FEDER programme which are gratefully acknowledged for the financial support (Projects “Development of methods for early cancer detection; ONCOVER—detection system of volatile compounds for early diagnosis of lung, colon and prostate cancer”, CCB.030PM). This research was also supported in part by the BioGuidePCa (E! 11023, Eurostars) funded by BMBF (Germany) and PCaProTreat (H2020-MSCA-IF-2017-800048).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Cancer Research UK.
Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/6/11
Y1 - 2019/6/11
N2 - Background: Prostate cancer progresses slowly when present in low risk forms but can be lethal when it progresses to metastatic disease. A non-invasive test that can detect significant prostate cancer is needed to guide patient management. Methods: Capillary electrophoresis/mass spectrometry has been employed to identify urinary peptides that may accurately detect significant prostate cancer. Urine samples from 823 patients with PSA (<15 ng/ml) were collected prior to biopsy. A case–control comparison was performed in a training set of 543 patients (nSig = 98; nnon-Sig = 445) and a validation set of 280 patients (nSig = 48, nnon-Sig = 232). Totally, 19 significant peptides were subsequently combined by a support vector machine algorithm. Results: Independent validation of the 19-biomarker model in 280 patients resulted in a 90% sensitivity and 59% specificity, with an AUC of 0.81, outperforming PSA (AUC = 0.58) and the ERSPC-3/4 risk calculator (AUC = 0.69) in the validation set. Conclusions: This multi-parametric model holds promise to improve the current diagnosis of significant prostate cancer. This test as a guide to biopsy could help to decrease the number of biopsies and guide intervention. Nevertheless, further prospective validation in an external clinical cohort is required to assess the exact performance characteristics.
AB - Background: Prostate cancer progresses slowly when present in low risk forms but can be lethal when it progresses to metastatic disease. A non-invasive test that can detect significant prostate cancer is needed to guide patient management. Methods: Capillary electrophoresis/mass spectrometry has been employed to identify urinary peptides that may accurately detect significant prostate cancer. Urine samples from 823 patients with PSA (<15 ng/ml) were collected prior to biopsy. A case–control comparison was performed in a training set of 543 patients (nSig = 98; nnon-Sig = 445) and a validation set of 280 patients (nSig = 48, nnon-Sig = 232). Totally, 19 significant peptides were subsequently combined by a support vector machine algorithm. Results: Independent validation of the 19-biomarker model in 280 patients resulted in a 90% sensitivity and 59% specificity, with an AUC of 0.81, outperforming PSA (AUC = 0.58) and the ERSPC-3/4 risk calculator (AUC = 0.69) in the validation set. Conclusions: This multi-parametric model holds promise to improve the current diagnosis of significant prostate cancer. This test as a guide to biopsy could help to decrease the number of biopsies and guide intervention. Nevertheless, further prospective validation in an external clinical cohort is required to assess the exact performance characteristics.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065962976&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41416-019-0472-z
DO - 10.1038/s41416-019-0472-z
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 31092909
AN - SCOPUS:85065962976
SN - 0007-0920
VL - 120
SP - 1120
EP - 1128
JO - British Journal of Cancer
JF - British Journal of Cancer
IS - 12
ER -