TY - JOUR
T1 - Cathepsin D serum levels are not a valid serum marker in renal cell carcinoma
AU - Merseburger, Axel S.
AU - Hennenlotter, Joerg
AU - Stenzl, Arnulf
AU - Beger, Gundhild
AU - Rinnab, Ludwig
AU - Kuczyk, Markus A.
AU - Kuefer, Rainer
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2009 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2007/7
Y1 - 2007/7
N2 - Background: It was the aim of this study to evaluate the serum levels of cathepsin D (Cath D) as a diagnostic tool in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in comparison with healthy volunteers. Methods: Cath D serum levels were measured in serum samples obtained preoperatively from 32 patients with histologically confirmed RCC versus 30 healthy individuals using an enzyme immunoassay. Additionally, for the tumor group, Cath D serum levels were correlated with tumor stage and grade as determined according to the 2002 TNM classification. Results: The serum Cath D concentration was not significantly different in patients with RCC compared with healthy individuals (mean 16.58 vs. 16.64 ng/ml; p = 0.43). Furthermore, there was no significant association between Cath D serum levels and several patient or tumor characteristics such as tumor stage, tumor grade, lymph node status, presence of metastasis, gender or age. Conclusions: In contrast to overexpression of Cath D in primary RCC tissue, serum Cath D is not altered in RCC patients when compared with healthy volunteers. In this small cohort, Cath D serum levels did not reveal additional clinical information in patients diagnosed with a small renal mass. Further prospective multicenter studies might shed more light on the value of Cath D in the diagnostics of RCC.
AB - Background: It was the aim of this study to evaluate the serum levels of cathepsin D (Cath D) as a diagnostic tool in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in comparison with healthy volunteers. Methods: Cath D serum levels were measured in serum samples obtained preoperatively from 32 patients with histologically confirmed RCC versus 30 healthy individuals using an enzyme immunoassay. Additionally, for the tumor group, Cath D serum levels were correlated with tumor stage and grade as determined according to the 2002 TNM classification. Results: The serum Cath D concentration was not significantly different in patients with RCC compared with healthy individuals (mean 16.58 vs. 16.64 ng/ml; p = 0.43). Furthermore, there was no significant association between Cath D serum levels and several patient or tumor characteristics such as tumor stage, tumor grade, lymph node status, presence of metastasis, gender or age. Conclusions: In contrast to overexpression of Cath D in primary RCC tissue, serum Cath D is not altered in RCC patients when compared with healthy volunteers. In this small cohort, Cath D serum levels did not reveal additional clinical information in patients diagnosed with a small renal mass. Further prospective multicenter studies might shed more light on the value of Cath D in the diagnostics of RCC.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34447329564&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1159/000102912
DO - 10.1159/000102912
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 17627167
AN - SCOPUS:34447329564
SN - 0042-1138
VL - 79
SP - 41
EP - 43
JO - Urologia Internationalis
JF - Urologia Internationalis
IS - 1
ER -