Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Brain network of semantic integration in sentence reading: Insights from independent component analysis and graph theoretical analysis

Zheng Ye, Nuria Doñamayor, Thomas F. Münte*

*Corresponding author for this work

Abstract

A set of cortical and sub-cortical brain structures has been linked with sentence-level semantic processes. However, it remains unclear how these brain regions are organized to support the semantic integration of a word into sentential context. To look into this issue, we conducted a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study that required participants to silently read sentences with semantically congruent or incongruent endings and analyzed the network properties of the brain with two approaches, independent component analysis (ICA) and graph theoretical analysis (GTA). The GTA suggested that the whole-brain network is topologically stable across conditions. The ICA revealed a network comprising the supplementary motor area (SMA), left inferior frontal gyrus, left middle temporal gyrus, left caudate nucleus, and left angular gyrus, which was modulated by the incongruity of sentence ending. Furthermore, the GTA specified that the connections between the left SMA and left caudate nucleus as well as that between the left caudate nucleus and right thalamus were stronger in response to incongruent vs. congruent endings. Hum Brain Mapp 35:367-376, 2014.

Original languageEnglish
JournalHuman Brain Mapping
Volume35
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)367-376
Number of pages10
ISSN1065-9471
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.02.2014

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Brain network of semantic integration in sentence reading: Insights from independent component analysis and graph theoretical analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this