Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Biological, as opposed to classic antipsoriatic drug or apremilast, treatment mitigates the risk of death and cardiovascular disease in psoriasis

Khalaf Kridin, Katja Bieber, Artem Vorobyev, Eva Lotta Moderegger, Henning Olbrich, Marlene A. Ludwig, Bernard Gershater, Gema Hernandez, Henner Zirpel, Diamant Thaci, Ralf J. Ludwig*

*Corresponding author for this work

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular comorbidity increases morbidity and mortality in psoriasis. Systemic treatments, particularly biologics, are effective in alleviating skin and joint inflammation. Conversely, the impact of systemic therapy on cardiovascular disease risk and mortality in psoriasis remains uncertain. Methods: Impact of systemic treatments on all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease risk in psoriasis patients' electronic health records (EHRs) from TriNetX was assessed. Treatment categories included apremilast, IL-17 inhibitors (IL-17i), IL23i, TNFi, and classic antipsoriatic drugs. Index event was the first prescription of each treatment, requiring a two-year continuous treatment with exclusion of other systemic antipsoriatic drugs. Propensity-score matching was used to improve comparability. Sensitivity analyses ensured study robustness. Findings: In descriptive analysis, all-cause mortality rates were 0.61% (classic antipsoriatics, n = 7929), 0.91% (apremilast, n = 1101), 0.00% (IL17i, n = 677), 0.81% (IL23i, n = 1242), and 0.20% (TNFi, n = 6468). Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were documented in 8.49% (classic antipsoriatics), 5.14% (apremilast), 2.99% (IL17i), 2.09% (IL23i), and 3.74% (TNFi) EHRs. Propensity-score matching showed all-cause mortality rates of 0.23% for any biologic vs. 0.49% for classic antipsoriatics or apremilast, resulting in an HR of 2.21 (95% CI 1.21–3.71, p = 0.0073). MACE risk was also higher with classic antipsoriatics or apremilast (HR 1.66, CI 1.43–1.93, p < 0.0001). The majority of findings were consistent across all four sensitivity analyses. No significant differences in all-cause mortality or MACE risk were observed among biologics. Interpretation: Biological treatment, as opposed to classic antipsoriatic drugs or apremilast, reduces risk of death and cardiovascular disease in psoriasis. Prospective trials are required to validate these findings. Funding: DFG: EXC 2167 and LU 877/25-1. State of Schleswig Holstein: Excellence-Chair Program.

Original languageEnglish
Article number105485
JournaleBioMedicine
Volume111
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.2025

Funding

FundersFunder number
State of Schleswig-Holstein*
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Research Areas and Centers

    • Academic Focus: Center for Infection and Inflammation Research (ZIEL)
    • Centers: Center for Research on Inflammation of the Skin (CRIS)
    • Centers: Cardiological Center Luebeck (UHZL)

    DFG Research Classification Scheme

    • 2.21-05 Immunology
    • 2.22-19 Dermatology
    • 2.22-09 Pharmacology
    • 2.22-12 Cardiology, Angiology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Biological, as opposed to classic antipsoriatic drug or apremilast, treatment mitigates the risk of death and cardiovascular disease in psoriasis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this