Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Benchmarking of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy: European multicentre study

  • European Consortium on Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery (E-MIPS)
  • Niguarda Hospital
  • University of Amsterdam
  • University of Verona
  • University of Oslo
  • University of Cambridge
  • University Hospital Pisa
  • Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna
  • Hopital Beaujon
  • Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Pederzoli Hospital
  • Humanitas University
  • Universitari Vall d'Hebrón
  • University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
  • Royal Free London
  • Hopital Saint-Eloi
  • Linköping University
  • Charite - Universitatsmedizin Berlin
  • Department of Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Hospital del Mar
  • Ruprecht-Karls Universität Heidelberg
  • Erasmus University Medical Center
  • Groeninge Hospital
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Careggi
  • Hopital Civil
  • IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo - Pavia
  • Morriston Hospital
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello
  • Istituto Villa Salus
  • Utrecht University
  • Barts Health NHS Trust
  • Fondazione Poliambulanza-Istituto Ospedaliero
  • IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas - Rozzano (Milano)

Abstract

Background: Benchmarking is the process to used assess the best achievable results and compare outcomes with that standard. This study aimed to assess best achievable outcomes in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy (MIDPS). Methods: This retrospective study included consecutive patients undergoing MIDPS for any indication, between 2003 and 2019, in 31 European centres. Benchmarks of the main clinical outcomes were calculated according to the Achievable Benchmark of Care (ABC™) method. After identifying independent risk factors for severe morbidity and conversion, risk-adjusted ABCs were calculated for each subgroup of patients at risk. Results: A total of 1595 patients were included. The ABC was 2.5 per cent for conversion and 8.4 per cent for severe morbidity. ABC values were 160 min for duration of operation time, 8.3 per cent for POPF, 1.8 per cent for reoperation, and 0 per cent for mortality. Multivariable analysis showed that conversion was associated with male sex (OR 1.48), BMI exceeding 30 kg/m2 (OR 2.42), multivisceral resection (OR 3.04), and laparoscopy (OR 2.24). Increased risk of severe morbidity was associated with ASA fitness grade above II (OR 1.60), multivisceral resection (OR 1.88), and robotic approach (OR 1.87). Conclusion: The benchmark values obtained using the ABC method represent optimal outcomes from best achievable care, including low complication rates and zero mortality. These benchmarks should be used to set standards to improve patient outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBJS
Volume109
Issue number11
Pages (from-to)1124-1130
Number of pages7
ISSN0007-1323
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.11.2022

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Research Areas and Centers

  • Research Area: Luebeck Integrated Oncology Network (LION)
  • Centers: University Cancer Center Schleswig-Holstein (UCCSH)

DFG Research Classification Scheme

  • 2.22-25 General and Visceral Surgery
  • 2.22-14 Hematology, Oncology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Benchmarking of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy: European multicentre study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this