Avoidant responses to interpersonal provocation are associated with increased amygdala and decreased mentalizing network activity

Macià Buades-Rotger*, Frederike Beyer, Ulrike M. Krämer

*Corresponding author for this work
2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

When intentionally pushed or insulted, one can either flee from the provoker or retaliate. The implementation of such fight-or-flight decisions is a central aspect in the genesis and evolution of aggression episodes, yet it is usually investigated only indirectly or in nonsocial situations. In the present fMRI study, we aimed to distinguish brain regions associated with aggressive and avoidant responses to interpersonal provocation in humans. Participants (thirty-six healthy young women) could either avoid or face a highly (HP) and a lowly (LP) provoking opponent in a competitive reaction time task: the fight-or-escape (FOE) paradigm. Subjects avoided the HP more often, but retaliated when facing her. Moreover, they chose to fight the HP more quickly, and showed increased heart rate (HR) right before confronting her. Orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and sensorimotor cortex were more active when participants decided to fight, whereas the mentalizing network was engaged when deciding to avoid. Importantly, avoiding the HP relative to the LP was associated with both higher activation in the right basolateral amygdala and lower relative activity in several mentalizing regions [e.g., medial and inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), temporal-parietal junction (TPJ)]. These results suggest that avoidant responses to provocation might result from heightened threat anticipation and are associated with re- duced perspective taking. Furthermore, our study helps to reconcile conflicting findings on the role of the mentalizing network, the amygdala, and the OFC in aggression.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0337-16.2017
JournaleNeuro
Volume4
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.01.2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Avoidant responses to interpersonal provocation are associated with increased amygdala and decreased mentalizing network activity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this