Abstract
Objectives
To develop and validate a deep learning–based algorithm for segmenting and quantifying the physiological and diseased aorta in computed tomography angiographies.
Methods
CTA exams of the aorta of 191 patients (68.1 ± 14 years, 128 male), performed between 2015 and 2018, were retrospectively identified from our imaging archive and manually segmented by two investigators. A 3D U-Net model was trained on the data, which was divided into a training, a validation, and a test group at a ratio of 7:1:2. Cases in the test group (n = 41) were evaluated to compare manual and automatic segmentations. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), mean surface distance (MSD), and Hausdorff surface distance (HSD) were extracted. Maximum diameter, effective diameter, and area were quantified and compared between both segmentations at eight anatomical landmarks, and at the maximum area of an aneurysms if present (n = 14). Statistics included error calculation, intraclass correlation coefficient, and Bland-Altman analysis.
Results
A DSC of 0.95 [0.94; 0.95] and an MSD of 0.76 [0.06; 0.99] indicated close agreement between segmentations. HSD was 8.00 [4.47; 10.00]. The largest absolute errors were found in the ascending aorta with 0.8 ± 1.5 mm for maximum diameter and at the coeliac trunk with − 30.0 ± 81.6 mm2 for area. Results for absolute errors in aneurysms were − 0.5 ± 2.3 mm for maximum diameter, 0.3 ± 1.6 mm for effective diameter, and 64.9 ± 114.9 mm2 for area. ICC showed excellent agreement (> 0.9; p < 0.05) between quantitative measurements.
Conclusions
Automated segmentation of the aorta on CTA data using a deep learning algorithm is feasible and allows for accurate quantification of the aortic lumen even if the vascular architecture is altered by disease.
To develop and validate a deep learning–based algorithm for segmenting and quantifying the physiological and diseased aorta in computed tomography angiographies.
Methods
CTA exams of the aorta of 191 patients (68.1 ± 14 years, 128 male), performed between 2015 and 2018, were retrospectively identified from our imaging archive and manually segmented by two investigators. A 3D U-Net model was trained on the data, which was divided into a training, a validation, and a test group at a ratio of 7:1:2. Cases in the test group (n = 41) were evaluated to compare manual and automatic segmentations. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), mean surface distance (MSD), and Hausdorff surface distance (HSD) were extracted. Maximum diameter, effective diameter, and area were quantified and compared between both segmentations at eight anatomical landmarks, and at the maximum area of an aneurysms if present (n = 14). Statistics included error calculation, intraclass correlation coefficient, and Bland-Altman analysis.
Results
A DSC of 0.95 [0.94; 0.95] and an MSD of 0.76 [0.06; 0.99] indicated close agreement between segmentations. HSD was 8.00 [4.47; 10.00]. The largest absolute errors were found in the ascending aorta with 0.8 ± 1.5 mm for maximum diameter and at the coeliac trunk with − 30.0 ± 81.6 mm2 for area. Results for absolute errors in aneurysms were − 0.5 ± 2.3 mm for maximum diameter, 0.3 ± 1.6 mm for effective diameter, and 64.9 ± 114.9 mm2 for area. ICC showed excellent agreement (> 0.9; p < 0.05) between quantitative measurements.
Conclusions
Automated segmentation of the aorta on CTA data using a deep learning algorithm is feasible and allows for accurate quantification of the aortic lumen even if the vascular architecture is altered by disease.
| Original language | Undefined/Unknown |
|---|---|
| Journal | European Radiology |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Pages (from-to) | 690-701 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| ISSN | 0938-7994 |
| Publication status | Published - 25.06.2021 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver