TY - JOUR
T1 - Atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with pulmonary lobectomy or pneumectomy: Procedural challenges and efficacy
AU - Fink, Thomas
AU - Sciacca, Vanessa
AU - Heeger, Christian Hendrik
AU - Vogler, Julia
AU - Eitel, Charlotte
AU - Reissmann, Bruno
AU - Rottner, Laura
AU - Rillig, Andreas
AU - Mathew, Shibu
AU - Maurer, Tilman
AU - Ouyang, Feifan
AU - Kuck, Karl Heinz
AU - Metzner, Andreas
AU - Tilz, Roland Richard
N1 - Funding Information:
Dr Christian Hendrik Heeger received travel grants and research grants by Medtronic, Claret Medical, SentreHeart, Biosense Webster, and Cardiofocus. He received speaker's bureau/proctor honoraria from Cardiofocus and Medtronic. Dr Charlotte Eitel received travel grants from Biosense Webster, Medtronic, Biotronik, Abbot and Daiichi Sankyo and speaker's honoraria from Biosense Webster, Medtronic, Abbot, Sentrheart, and Daiichi Sankyo. Dr Shibu Mathew received speaker's honoraria and travel grants from Medtronic. Dr Andreas Rillig received travel grants from Biosense, Hansen Medical, EP Solutions, Medtronic and St. Jude Medical, and lecture fees from St. Jude Medical, Medtronic, and Boehringer Ingelheim and took part at the Boston scientific EP fellowship. Professor Karl‐Heinz Kuck received research grants and personal fees from St. Jude Medical, Medtronic, and Biosense Webster. Dr Andreas Metzner received speaker's honoraria and travel grants from Medtronic. Professor Roland R. Tilz received research grants from Medtronic and Biotronik; travel grants from Biosense Webster, Medtronic, Abbot, SentreHeart, and Daiichi Sankyo, and speaker's bureau/proctor honoraria from Biosense Webster, Medtronic, Abbot, Sentrheart, and Daiichi Sankyo; he is consultant of Biosense Webster and Biotronik. The other authors do not report any conflicts of interest. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not‐for‐profit sectors.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/10/1
Y1 - 2020/10/1
N2 - Background: Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with pulmonary lobectomy or pneumectomy is challenging due to anatomical alterations. After lung resection, electrically active pulmonary vein (PV) stumps remain and need to be localized for PV isolation (PVI). The present study aims to describe clinical challenges of PVI in patients with pulmonary lobectomy or pneumectomy. Methods: We performed a retrospective study on 19 patients with previous pulmonary lobectomy or pneumectomy undergoing catheter ablation for AF in three German hospitals. Results: Nineteen patients with paroxysmal, persistent, or longstanding-persistent AF and history of pulmonary lobectomy (n = 11) or pneumectomy (n = 8) were enrolled. Catheter ablation was performed as radiofrequency (RF) ablation using 3D mapping, robotic RF ablation, or by using balloon devices. Decent anatomical changes were observed in patients with lobectomy while cardiac rotation and mediastinal shifting was dominant in patients with pneumectomy. Visualization of all PVs including PV stumps by PV angiography was possible in 10 of 19 patients (52.6%). PV spikes were observed in all identified PV remnants. In nine patients (47.4%), at least one PV remnant could not be identified and electrical isolation was not performed. During 24 months follow-up, patients with incomplete PVI had a significantly shorter arrhythmia-free survival than patients with complete PVI (76.2% [95% Confidence interval (CI) 47.2-100.0%] vs 40.0% [95% CI 5.6-74.1%], P =.043). Conclusion: In patients with AF and previous lobectomy or pneumectomy, identification and isolation of all PVs are challenging but crucial for ablation success. Additional imaging techniques may be necessary to achieve complete PVI.
AB - Background: Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with pulmonary lobectomy or pneumectomy is challenging due to anatomical alterations. After lung resection, electrically active pulmonary vein (PV) stumps remain and need to be localized for PV isolation (PVI). The present study aims to describe clinical challenges of PVI in patients with pulmonary lobectomy or pneumectomy. Methods: We performed a retrospective study on 19 patients with previous pulmonary lobectomy or pneumectomy undergoing catheter ablation for AF in three German hospitals. Results: Nineteen patients with paroxysmal, persistent, or longstanding-persistent AF and history of pulmonary lobectomy (n = 11) or pneumectomy (n = 8) were enrolled. Catheter ablation was performed as radiofrequency (RF) ablation using 3D mapping, robotic RF ablation, or by using balloon devices. Decent anatomical changes were observed in patients with lobectomy while cardiac rotation and mediastinal shifting was dominant in patients with pneumectomy. Visualization of all PVs including PV stumps by PV angiography was possible in 10 of 19 patients (52.6%). PV spikes were observed in all identified PV remnants. In nine patients (47.4%), at least one PV remnant could not be identified and electrical isolation was not performed. During 24 months follow-up, patients with incomplete PVI had a significantly shorter arrhythmia-free survival than patients with complete PVI (76.2% [95% Confidence interval (CI) 47.2-100.0%] vs 40.0% [95% CI 5.6-74.1%], P =.043). Conclusion: In patients with AF and previous lobectomy or pneumectomy, identification and isolation of all PVs are challenging but crucial for ablation success. Additional imaging techniques may be necessary to achieve complete PVI.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090127425&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/pace.14041
DO - 10.1111/pace.14041
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 32794580
AN - SCOPUS:85090127425
SN - 0147-8389
VL - 43
SP - 1115
EP - 1125
JO - PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
JF - PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
IS - 10
ER -