TY - JOUR
T1 - Associations between organizational injustice and work ability, self-reported disability days, and medical consultations: cross-sectional findings from employees with prior sickness absence payments
AU - Spanier, Katja
AU - Peters, Elke
AU - Michel, Elliot
AU - Radoschewski, Friedrich Michael
AU - Bethge, Matthias
PY - 2017/11/1
Y1 - 2017/11/1
N2 - Purpose: The aim of the study was to identify associations between organizational injustice and work ability, disability days, and consultations with general practitioners. Methods: Cross-sectional data of persons previously receiving sickness absence benefits were used for analyses. Organizational injustice was assessed using a German version of the “organizational justice questionnaire”. Dependent variables were the Work Ability Index, self-reported disability days, and consultations with general practitioners. Associations were adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics, behavioral health risks, neuroticism, effort–reward imbalance, and overcommitment. Results: The analysis included 2983 employed persons (54.1% women, mean age: 47.9 years). High organizational injustice was associated with poor work ability (OR = 2.04, 95% CI 1.55–2.69). There were also slight associations with frequent self-reported disability days (OR = 1.34, 95% CI 1.06–1.68). The dependent variables were also associated with the effort–reward ratio and overcommitment. Conclusion: Organizational injustice is associated with work ability, self-reported disability days, and health-care utilization. Results support the notion of a complementary role of the models of organizational justice and effort–reward imbalance.
AB - Purpose: The aim of the study was to identify associations between organizational injustice and work ability, disability days, and consultations with general practitioners. Methods: Cross-sectional data of persons previously receiving sickness absence benefits were used for analyses. Organizational injustice was assessed using a German version of the “organizational justice questionnaire”. Dependent variables were the Work Ability Index, self-reported disability days, and consultations with general practitioners. Associations were adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics, behavioral health risks, neuroticism, effort–reward imbalance, and overcommitment. Results: The analysis included 2983 employed persons (54.1% women, mean age: 47.9 years). High organizational injustice was associated with poor work ability (OR = 2.04, 95% CI 1.55–2.69). There were also slight associations with frequent self-reported disability days (OR = 1.34, 95% CI 1.06–1.68). The dependent variables were also associated with the effort–reward ratio and overcommitment. Conclusion: Organizational injustice is associated with work ability, self-reported disability days, and health-care utilization. Results support the notion of a complementary role of the models of organizational justice and effort–reward imbalance.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85025160263&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00420-017-1242-y
DO - 10.1007/s00420-017-1242-y
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 28660322
AN - SCOPUS:85025160263
SN - 0340-0131
VL - 90
SP - 789
EP - 797
JO - International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
JF - International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
IS - 8
ER -