Assessment of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis using cardiac magnetic resonance tomography: Comparison with echocardiography

Nasser M. Malyar*, Thomas Schlosser, Jörg Barkhausen, Achim Gutersohn, Thomas Buck, Thomas Bartel, Raimund Erbel

*Corresponding author for this work
18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Cardiac magnetic resonance tomography (CMR) is a new imaging technique capable of imaging the aortic valve with high resolution. We assessed the aortic valve area (AVA) in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) using CMR and compared the results to those obtained by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Methods: Forty-two patients (36% female, 71 ± 8 years) symptomatic for AS underwent TTE followed by TEE to determine the AVA; the continuity equation was used with TTE and the planimetry technique with TEE. In 26 of these patients, the AVA was additionally obtained by CMR planimetry. Results: The mean AVA derived by TTE, TEE and CMR were 0.74 ± 0.27, 0.87 ± 25 and 0.97 ± 0.30 cm2, respectively. The mean absolute differences in AVA were 0.13 ± 0.19 cm2 for TTE vs. TEE, 0.21 ± 0.25 cm2 for TTE vs. CMR and 0.05 ± 0.11 cm2 for CMR vs. TEE. Conclusion: There is a good agreement between CMR and the echocardiographic determination of the AVA. If multicenter, large-scale studies confirm these observations, CMR could serve as a noninvasive alternative to TTE/TEE for the assessment of AVA in AS.

Original languageEnglish
JournalCardiology
Volume109
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)126-134
Number of pages9
ISSN0008-6312
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.01.2008

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessment of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis using cardiac magnetic resonance tomography: Comparison with echocardiography'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this