TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessment of 4D Ultrasound Systems for Image-guided Radiation Therapy - Image Quality, Framerates and CT Artifacts
AU - Ipsen, Svenja
AU - Bruder, Ralf
AU - García-Vázquez, Verónica
AU - Schweikard, Achim
AU - Ernst, Floris
N1 - Funding Information:
Parts of this work were supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (grant no. 13GW0228B), the German Research Foundation (grant no. ER 817/1-1), the Ministry of Economic Affairs, Employment, Transport and Technology of Schleswig-Holstein.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston.
Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/9/1
Y1 - 2019/9/1
N2 - 4D ultrasound (4D US) is gaining relevance as a tracking method in radiation therapy (RT) with modern matrix array probes offering new possibilities for real-time target detection. However, for clinical implementation of USguided RT, image quality, volumetric framerate and artifacts caused by the probe's presence during planning and / or setup computed tomography (CT) must be quantified. We compared three diagnostic 4D US systems with matrix array probes using a commercial wire phantom to measure spatial resolution as well as a calibration and a torso phantom to assess different image quality metrics. CT artifacts were quantified in the torso phantom by calculating the total variation and percentage of affected voxels between a reference CT scan and CT scans with probes in place. We found that state-of-the-art 4D US systems with small probes can fit inside the CT bore and cause fewer metal artifacts than larger probes. US image quality varies between systems and is task-dependent. Volume sizes and framerates are much higher than the commercial guidance solution for US-guided RT, warranting further investigation regarding clinical performance for image guidance.
AB - 4D ultrasound (4D US) is gaining relevance as a tracking method in radiation therapy (RT) with modern matrix array probes offering new possibilities for real-time target detection. However, for clinical implementation of USguided RT, image quality, volumetric framerate and artifacts caused by the probe's presence during planning and / or setup computed tomography (CT) must be quantified. We compared three diagnostic 4D US systems with matrix array probes using a commercial wire phantom to measure spatial resolution as well as a calibration and a torso phantom to assess different image quality metrics. CT artifacts were quantified in the torso phantom by calculating the total variation and percentage of affected voxels between a reference CT scan and CT scans with probes in place. We found that state-of-the-art 4D US systems with small probes can fit inside the CT bore and cause fewer metal artifacts than larger probes. US image quality varies between systems and is task-dependent. Volume sizes and framerates are much higher than the commercial guidance solution for US-guided RT, warranting further investigation regarding clinical performance for image guidance.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072640922&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1515/cdbme-2019-0062
DO - 10.1515/cdbme-2019-0062
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:85072640922
SN - 2364-5504
VL - 5
SP - 245
EP - 248
JO - Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering
JF - Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering
IS - 1
ER -