Abstract
Recently, Maurer and colleagues reported that the peak amplitude of the P300 was distributed in specific topographical patterns for demented, hebephrenic, and paranoid patients. This evidence is critically discussed. For the hebephrenic and paranoid patients, it is doubtful whether their topographic patterns differed from normal subjects, while for the demented patients the impact of EOG artifacts is not clear. Some recommendations are given how to deal with artifacts before mapping the P300.
| Translated title of the contribution | Some comments on analyses of the P300 components using 'brain mapping' |
|---|---|
| Original language | German |
| Journal | EEG-EMG Zeitschrift fur Elektroenzephalographie Elektromyographie und Verwandte Gebiete |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Pages (from-to) | 133-135 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| ISSN | 0012-7590 |
| Publication status | Published - 01.01.1989 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Research Areas and Centers
- Academic Focus: Center for Brain, Behavior and Metabolism (CBBM)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Some comments on analyses of the P300 components using 'brain mapping''. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver