Analysis and Comparison of Atomic Commit Protocols for Adaptive Usage in Wireless Sensor Networks

C. Reinke; N. Hoeller; J. Neumann; S. Groppe; S. Werner; V. Linnemann

doi:10.1109/SUTC.2010.12

Analysis and Comparison of Atomic Commit Protocols for Adaptive Usage in Wireless Sensor Networks

C. Reinke, N. Hoeller, J. Neumann, S. Groppe, S. Werner, V. Linnemann

Institute of Information Systems

Abstract

Despite many research in the area of wireless sensor networks (WSNs) in recent years, the programming of sensor nodes is still time-consuming and tedious. One of the new paradigms which seem to be qualified to simplify the programming of sensor networks are service oriented architectures (SOAs). The composition of simple services to more complex ones can be a convenient way to design own applications. However, to enable the sophisticated techniques known from SOAs like replication and migration of services, a transactional model for WSNs is needed. In this paper, we compare the applicability of the standard commit protocol Two Phase Commit (2PC) and the Cross Layer Commit Protocol (CLCP) to our scenario and present our own protocol Two Phase Commit with Caching (2PCwC). We show that the best results in terms of transmitted bytes per commit decision and memory consumption can be achieved if the appropriate protocol is chosen adaptively during runtime.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	2010 IEEE International Conference on Sensor Networks, Ubiquitous, and Trustworthy Computing
Number of pages	8
Publisher	IEEE
Publication date	01.06.2010
Pages	138-145
ISBN (Print)	978-1-4244-7087-7
ISBN (Electronic)	978-1-4244-7088-4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1109/SUTC.2010.12
Publication status	Published - 01.06.2010
Event	2010 IEEE International Conference on Sensor Networks, Ubiquitous, and Trustworthy Computing, SUTC 2010, 2010 IEEE International Workshop on Ubiquitous and Mobile Computing, UMC 2010 - Newport Beach, United States Duration: 07.06.2010 → 09.06.2010 Conference number: 82012

Research Areas and Centers

Research Area: Intelligent Systems
Centers: Center for Artificial Intelligence Luebeck (ZKIL)

DFG Research Classification Scheme

409-04 Operating, Communication, Database and Distributed Systems

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1109/SUTC.2010.12

Cite this

@inproceedings{c737bb4e670047408ae7a402296a0ae2,

title = "Analysis and Comparison of Atomic Commit Protocols for Adaptive Usage in Wireless Sensor Networks",

abstract = "Despite many research in the area of wireless sensor networks (WSNs) in recent years, the programming of sensor nodes is still time-consuming and tedious. One of the new paradigms which seem to be qualified to simplify the programming of sensor networks are service oriented architectures (SOAs). The composition of simple services to more complex ones can be a convenient way to design own applications. However, to enable the sophisticated techniques known from SOAs like replication and migration of services, a transactional model for WSNs is needed. In this paper, we compare the applicability of the standard commit protocol Two Phase Commit (2PC) and the Cross Layer Commit Protocol (CLCP) to our scenario and present our own protocol Two Phase Commit with Caching (2PCwC). We show that the best results in terms of transmitted bytes per commit decision and memory consumption can be achieved if the appropriate protocol is chosen adaptively during runtime.",

author = "C. Reinke and N. Hoeller and J. Neumann and S. Groppe and S. Werner and V. Linnemann",

year = "2010",

month = jun,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1109/SUTC.2010.12",

language = "English",

isbn = "978-1-4244-7087-7",

series = "IEEE Proceedings",

publisher = "IEEE",

pages = "138--145",

booktitle = "2010 IEEE International Conference on Sensor Networks, Ubiquitous, and Trustworthy Computing",

note = "2010 IEEE International Conference on Sensor Networks, Ubiquitous, and Trustworthy Computing, SUTC 2010, 2010 IEEE International Workshop on Ubiquitous and Mobile Computing, UMC 2010 ; Conference date: 07-06-2010 Through 09-06-2010",

}

Reinke, C, Hoeller, N, Neumann, J, Groppe, S, Werner, S & Linnemann, V 2010, Analysis and Comparison of Atomic Commit Protocols for Adaptive Usage in Wireless Sensor Networks. in 2010 IEEE International Conference on Sensor Networks, Ubiquitous, and Trustworthy Computing. IEEE Proceedings, IEEE, pp. 138-145, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Sensor Networks, Ubiquitous, and Trustworthy Computing, SUTC 2010, 2010 IEEE International Workshop on Ubiquitous and Mobile Computing, UMC 2010 , Newport Beach, California, United States, 07.06.10. https://doi.org/10.1109/SUTC.2010.12

Analysis and Comparison of Atomic Commit Protocols for Adaptive Usage in Wireless Sensor Networks. / Reinke, C.; Hoeller, N.; Neumann, J. et al.
2010 IEEE International Conference on Sensor Networks, Ubiquitous, and Trustworthy Computing. IEEE, 2010. p. 138-145 (IEEE Proceedings).

Research output: Chapters in Books/Reports/Conference Proceedings › Conference contribution › peer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Analysis and Comparison of Atomic Commit Protocols for Adaptive Usage in Wireless Sensor Networks

AU - Reinke, C.

AU - Hoeller, N.

AU - Neumann, J.

AU - Groppe, S.

AU - Werner, S.

AU - Linnemann, V.

N1 - Conference code: 82012

PY - 2010/6/1

Y1 - 2010/6/1

N2 - Despite many research in the area of wireless sensor networks (WSNs) in recent years, the programming of sensor nodes is still time-consuming and tedious. One of the new paradigms which seem to be qualified to simplify the programming of sensor networks are service oriented architectures (SOAs). The composition of simple services to more complex ones can be a convenient way to design own applications. However, to enable the sophisticated techniques known from SOAs like replication and migration of services, a transactional model for WSNs is needed. In this paper, we compare the applicability of the standard commit protocol Two Phase Commit (2PC) and the Cross Layer Commit Protocol (CLCP) to our scenario and present our own protocol Two Phase Commit with Caching (2PCwC). We show that the best results in terms of transmitted bytes per commit decision and memory consumption can be achieved if the appropriate protocol is chosen adaptively during runtime.

AB - Despite many research in the area of wireless sensor networks (WSNs) in recent years, the programming of sensor nodes is still time-consuming and tedious. One of the new paradigms which seem to be qualified to simplify the programming of sensor networks are service oriented architectures (SOAs). The composition of simple services to more complex ones can be a convenient way to design own applications. However, to enable the sophisticated techniques known from SOAs like replication and migration of services, a transactional model for WSNs is needed. In this paper, we compare the applicability of the standard commit protocol Two Phase Commit (2PC) and the Cross Layer Commit Protocol (CLCP) to our scenario and present our own protocol Two Phase Commit with Caching (2PCwC). We show that the best results in terms of transmitted bytes per commit decision and memory consumption can be achieved if the appropriate protocol is chosen adaptively during runtime.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-77958554484&origin=inward&txGid=2fc14947ca5c9c1301e8a3768ef6a541

U2 - 10.1109/SUTC.2010.12

DO - 10.1109/SUTC.2010.12

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 978-1-4244-7087-7

T3 - IEEE Proceedings

SP - 138

EP - 145

BT - 2010 IEEE International Conference on Sensor Networks, Ubiquitous, and Trustworthy Computing

PB - IEEE

T2 - 2010 IEEE International Conference on Sensor Networks, Ubiquitous, and Trustworthy Computing, SUTC 2010, 2010 IEEE International Workshop on Ubiquitous and Mobile Computing, UMC 2010

Y2 - 7 June 2010 through 9 June 2010

ER -

Analysis and Comparison of Atomic Commit Protocols for Adaptive Usage in Wireless Sensor Networks

Abstract

Research Areas and Centers

DFG Research Classification Scheme

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Service-oriented application development for sensor networks using self-organizing, migratable basic services

Cite this

Analysis and Comparison of Atomic Commit Protocols for Adaptive Usage in Wireless Sensor Networks

Abstract

Research Areas and Centers

DFG Research Classification Scheme

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Projects

Service-oriented application development for sensor networks using self-organizing, migratable basic services

Cite this