Acute kidney injury after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Impact of contrast agents, predictive factors, and prognostic importance in 203 patients with long-term follow-up

Kenichi Chatani*, Mohamed Abdel-Wahab, Nora Wübken-Kleinfeld, Ken Gordian, Kathrin Pötzing, Ahmad E. Mostafa, Ernst Günter Kraatz, Doreen Richardt, Mohamed El-Mawardy, Gert Richardt

*Corresponding author for this work
24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) frequently occurs following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and has been related to a worse outcome. We investigated the importance of contrast medium composition, either iso-osmolar (IOCM) or low-osmolar (LOCM) and assessed predictors for AKI after TAVI. Methods and results: We assessed AKI in 203 TAVI patients treated mainly with trans-femoral implantation and analgosedation. A total of 100 patients received IOCM and 103 LOCM. AKI was defined according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium. Following TAVI, 39 patients (19.2%) developed AKI; 17.0% of the IOCM and 21.4% of the LOCM group (p=0.43). The only independent predictor for AKI was baseline serum creatinine [odds ratio (OR) 0.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01-0.64, p=0.002]. Patients with advanced AKI (stages 2 and 3) post-TAVI had significantly higher mortality at 2 years (log rank p<. 0.001), whereas patients with AKI stage 1 had a similar long-term outcome to non-AKI patients. Conclusions: Following TAVI, we observed no difference in the occurrence of AKI between IOCM and LOCM. Baseline creatinine was the only independent predictor of AKI, and patients who developed advanced AKI had significantly higher mortality at 2 years.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Cardiology
Volume66
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)514-519
Number of pages6
ISSN0914-5087
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12.2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Acute kidney injury after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Impact of contrast agents, predictive factors, and prognostic importance in 203 patients with long-term follow-up'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this