Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM: Prognosis of patients with unresectable squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck requires improvement. This retrospective study compared accelerated radiotherapy plus chemotherapy to conventional radiochemotherapy.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received definitive treatment with accelerated radiotherapy plus chemotherapy (group A, n=10) or conventional cisplatin-based radiochemotherapy (group B, n=85). Groups were matched for several patient and tumor characteristics and compared for locoregional control (LRC), overall survival (OS) and toxicities. Additionally, accelerated radiotherapy plus chemotherapy and chemotherapy regimens in group B were compared for LRC and OS.
RESULTS: Treatment type had no significant impact on LRC (p=0.98) and OS (p=0.57). In group A, toxicities occurred more often, including grade ≥3 mucositis (p=0.041), grade ≥2 lymphedema (p=0.007) and grade ≥3 leucopenia (p=0.007). Best 2-year LRC (p=0.39) and OS (p=0.015) was achieved with 20 mg/m2 cisplatin days 1-5 every 4 weeks; accelerated radiochemotherapy resulted in second-worst outcomes.
CONCLUSION: Given the limitations of this study, accelerated radiotherapy plus chemotherapy provided no significant benefit but increased toxicity compared to conventional radiochemotherapy.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Anticancer Research |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Pages (from-to) | 877-884 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| ISSN | 0250-7005 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 02.2021 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Accelerated Fractionation Plus Chemotherapy Versus Conventionally Fractionated Radiochemotherapy for Unresectable Head-and-Neck Cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver