TY - JOUR
T1 - Ablation index for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: Clinical applicability and comparison with force-time integral
AU - Münkler, Paula
AU - Kröger, Stefan
AU - Liosis, Spyridon
AU - Abdin, Amr
AU - Lyan, Evgeny
AU - Eitel, Charlotte
AU - Eitel, Ingo
AU - Meyer, Christian
AU - Willems, Stephan
AU - Heeger, Christian Hendrik
AU - Tilz, Roland Richard
N1 - Funding Information:
The University Heart Center Hamburg has received a travel grant from Biosense Webster.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Japanese Circulation Society. All rights reserved.
Copyright:
Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/10/25
Y1 - 2018/10/25
N2 - Background: Key determinants for lesion formation in catheter ablation are contact force, radiofrequency (RF) power and time. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical applicability of ablation index (AI), a novel non-linear formula based on these components, and to compare AI with the conventional linear force-time interval (FTI) in pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Methods and Results: Target AI ranges were defined for anatomical segments of the ipsilateral pulmonary veins. The operator was blinded to AI during PVI for the initial 11 patients (group A), and was unblinded for the remaining 23 patients (group B). We assessed (1) the clinical value of AI to avoid excessively high and low values with an operator blinded vs. non-blinded to AI; and (2) the relation of AI and FTI in predefined ranges. In group A, 235/564 lesions (41.7%) were in the predefined target range as compared with 1,171/1,412 lesions (82.9%) in group B (P<0.001). A given AI may correspond to a wide range of FTI, as reflected by a quartile coefficient of dispersion for AI of 0.11 vs. a quartile coefficient of dispersion for FTI of 0.36. Conclusions: Incorporating RF current power, the non-linear AI provides more comprehensive information during PVI compared with FTI. Given that the FTI for a given AI varies widely, the value of FTI in clinical practice is questionable.
AB - Background: Key determinants for lesion formation in catheter ablation are contact force, radiofrequency (RF) power and time. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical applicability of ablation index (AI), a novel non-linear formula based on these components, and to compare AI with the conventional linear force-time interval (FTI) in pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Methods and Results: Target AI ranges were defined for anatomical segments of the ipsilateral pulmonary veins. The operator was blinded to AI during PVI for the initial 11 patients (group A), and was unblinded for the remaining 23 patients (group B). We assessed (1) the clinical value of AI to avoid excessively high and low values with an operator blinded vs. non-blinded to AI; and (2) the relation of AI and FTI in predefined ranges. In group A, 235/564 lesions (41.7%) were in the predefined target range as compared with 1,171/1,412 lesions (82.9%) in group B (P<0.001). A given AI may correspond to a wide range of FTI, as reflected by a quartile coefficient of dispersion for AI of 0.11 vs. a quartile coefficient of dispersion for FTI of 0.36. Conclusions: Incorporating RF current power, the non-linear AI provides more comprehensive information during PVI compared with FTI. Given that the FTI for a given AI varies widely, the value of FTI in clinical practice is questionable.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055571456&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1253/circj.CJ-18-0361
DO - 10.1253/circj.CJ-18-0361
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 30197409
AN - SCOPUS:85055571456
SN - 1346-9843
VL - 82
SP - 2722
EP - 2727
JO - Circulation Journal
JF - Circulation Journal
IS - 11
ER -