TY - JOUR
T1 - A Scoping Review of Flow Research
AU - Peifer, Corinna
AU - Wolters, Gina
AU - Harmat, László
AU - Heutte, Jean
AU - Tan, Jasmine
AU - Freire, Teresa
AU - Tavares, Dionísia
AU - Fonte, Carla
AU - Andersen, Frans Orsted
AU - van den Hout, Jef
AU - Šimleša, Milija
AU - Pola, Linda
AU - Ceja, Lucia
AU - Triberti, Stefano
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2022 Peifer, Wolters, Harmat, Heutte, Tan, Freire, Tavares, Fonte, Andersen, van den Hout, Šimleša, Pola, Ceja and Triberti.
PY - 2022/4/7
Y1 - 2022/4/7
N2 - Flow is a gratifying state of deep involvement and absorption that individuals report when facing a challenging activity and they perceive adequate abilities to cope with it (EFRN, 2014). The flow concept was introduced by Csikszentmihalyi in 1975, and interest in flow research is growing. However, to our best knowledge, no scoping review exists that takes a systematic look at studies on flow which were published between the years 2000 and 2016. Overall, 252 studies have been included in this review. Our review (1) provides a framework to cluster flow research, (2) gives a systematic overview about existing studies and their findings, and (3) provides an overview about implications for future research. The provided framework consists of three levels of flow research. In the first “Individual” level are the categories for personality, motivation, physiology, emotion, cognition, and behavior. The second “Contextual” level contains the categories for contextual and interindividual factors and the third “Cultural” level contains cultural factors that relate to flow. Using our framework, we systematically present the findings for each category. While flow research has made progress in understanding flow, in the future, more experimental and longitudinal studies are needed to gain deeper insights into the causal structure of flow and its antecedents and consequences.
AB - Flow is a gratifying state of deep involvement and absorption that individuals report when facing a challenging activity and they perceive adequate abilities to cope with it (EFRN, 2014). The flow concept was introduced by Csikszentmihalyi in 1975, and interest in flow research is growing. However, to our best knowledge, no scoping review exists that takes a systematic look at studies on flow which were published between the years 2000 and 2016. Overall, 252 studies have been included in this review. Our review (1) provides a framework to cluster flow research, (2) gives a systematic overview about existing studies and their findings, and (3) provides an overview about implications for future research. The provided framework consists of three levels of flow research. In the first “Individual” level are the categories for personality, motivation, physiology, emotion, cognition, and behavior. The second “Contextual” level contains the categories for contextual and interindividual factors and the third “Cultural” level contains cultural factors that relate to flow. Using our framework, we systematically present the findings for each category. While flow research has made progress in understanding flow, in the future, more experimental and longitudinal studies are needed to gain deeper insights into the causal structure of flow and its antecedents and consequences.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85123182445
U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.815665
DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.815665
M3 - Scientific review articles
AN - SCOPUS:85123182445
SN - 1664-1078
VL - 13
JO - Frontiers in Psychology
JF - Frontiers in Psychology
M1 - 815665
ER -