Abstract
Mepitel® Film (MEP) and standard care (STD) were compared for radiation dermatitis in SCCHN patients. This trial was stopped prematurely since13/28 patients did not tolerate MEP. Grade ≥2 dermatitis: 34.8% (MEP) vs. 35.7% (STD) at 50 Gy, 65.2% vs. 59.3% at 60 Gy. MEP was unsatisfactorily tolerated and appeared not superior (NCT03047174).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Radiotherapy and Oncology |
| Volume | 139 |
| Pages (from-to) | 79-82 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| ISSN | 0167-8140 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 10.2019 |
Funding
As part of the project InnoCan, the RAREST-01 study was funded by the European Regional Development Fund through the Interreg Deutschland-Danmark program (reference: Innoc 11-1.0-15). The funding body has no role in the design of the study, in collection, analysis and interpretation of the data and in writing of the manuscript.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A randomized trial (RAREST-01) comparing Mepitel® Film and standard care for prevention of radiation dermatitis in patients irradiated for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head-and-neck (SCCHN)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver