TY - JOUR
T1 - A Prospective Clinical Study Evaluating the Development of Bowel Wall Edema During Laparoscopic and Open Visceral Surgery
AU - Marjanovic, Goran
AU - Kuvendziska, Jasmina
AU - Holzner, Philipp Anton
AU - Glatz, Torben
AU - Sick, Olivia
AU - Seifert, Gabriel
AU - Kulemann, Birte
AU - Küsters, Simon
AU - Fink, Jodok
AU - Timme, Sylvia
AU - Hopt, Ulrich Theodor
AU - Wellner, Ulrich
AU - Keck, Tobias
AU - Karcz, Wojciech Konrad
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014, The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract.
Copyright:
Copyright 2015 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2014/11/18
Y1 - 2014/11/18
N2 - Background: To examine bowel wall edema development in laparoscopic and open major visceral surgery.Methods: In a prospective study, 47 consecutively operated patients with gastric and pancreatic resections were included. Twenty-seven patients were operated in a conventional open procedure (open group) and 20 in a laparoscopic fashion (lap group). In all procedures, a small jejunal segment was resected during standard preparation, of which we measured the dry-wet ratio. Furthermore, HE staining was performed for measuring of bowel wall thickness and edema assessment.Results: Mean value (±std) of dry-wet ratio was significantly lower in the open than in the lap group (0.169 ± 0.017 versus 0.179 ± 0.015; p = 0.03) with the same amount of fluid administration in both groups and a longer infusion interval during laparoscopic surgery. Subgroup analyses (only pancreatic resections) still showed similar results. Histologic examination depicted a significantly larger bowel wall thickness in the open group.Conclusions: Laparoscopic surgery does not seem to lead to the bowel wall edema observed to occur in open surgery regardless of the degree of intravenous fluid administration, thus supporting its use even in major visceral surgery.
AB - Background: To examine bowel wall edema development in laparoscopic and open major visceral surgery.Methods: In a prospective study, 47 consecutively operated patients with gastric and pancreatic resections were included. Twenty-seven patients were operated in a conventional open procedure (open group) and 20 in a laparoscopic fashion (lap group). In all procedures, a small jejunal segment was resected during standard preparation, of which we measured the dry-wet ratio. Furthermore, HE staining was performed for measuring of bowel wall thickness and edema assessment.Results: Mean value (±std) of dry-wet ratio was significantly lower in the open than in the lap group (0.169 ± 0.017 versus 0.179 ± 0.015; p = 0.03) with the same amount of fluid administration in both groups and a longer infusion interval during laparoscopic surgery. Subgroup analyses (only pancreatic resections) still showed similar results. Histologic examination depicted a significantly larger bowel wall thickness in the open group.Conclusions: Laparoscopic surgery does not seem to lead to the bowel wall edema observed to occur in open surgery regardless of the degree of intravenous fluid administration, thus supporting its use even in major visceral surgery.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84911991540&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11605-014-2681-3
DO - 10.1007/s11605-014-2681-3
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 25326126
AN - SCOPUS:84911991540
SN - 1091-255X
VL - 18
SP - 2149
EP - 2154
JO - Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
JF - Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
IS - 12
ER -