Abstract

Background: Differences in relative survival (RS) of melanoma between histologic subtypes were discussed to be mainly caused by tumor thickness. Objective: To investigate RS of melanoma, stratified by tumor thickness for each histologic subtype, and identify survival trends. Methods: With use of cancer registry data on melanoma cases (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, codes C43.0–C43.9) diagnosed in Germany in 1997–2013, 5- and 10-year age-standardized RS stratified by histologic subtype and stratified or standardized by T stage was estimated by standard and modeled period analyses. We restricted 10-year RS analyses to patients younger than 75 years. Results: We analyzed 82,901 cases. Overall, the 5- and 10-year RS rates were 91.7% and 90.8%, respectively. Prognosis worsened with increasing T stage for all histologic subtypes, but T-stage distribution varied substantially. Survival differences by histologic subtype were strongly alleviated after adjustment for T stage but remained significant. Overall, 5-year RS increased significantly (by 3.8 percentage points) between the periods 2002–2005 and 2010–2013. This increase was no longer seen after adjustment for T stage. Limitations: Exclusion of cases on account of missing information on T stages, changes in the definition of T stages, and lack of information on screening and treatment limit our analyses. Conclusion: Differences in RS between histologic subtypes were strongly mediated by tumor thickness. Over time, RS of melanoma increased as a result of changes in T-stage distribution.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Volume80
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)938-946
Number of pages9
ISSN0190-9622
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.04.2019

Research Areas and Centers

  • Research Area: Center for Population Medicine and Public Health (ZBV)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A population-based registry study on relative survival from melanoma in Germany stratified by tumor thickness for each histologic subtype'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this