TY - JOUR
T1 - A matched-pair study comparing surgery plus neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy and surgery alone for high rectal cancers
AU - Rades, Dirk
AU - Vogelsang, Rasmus Peuliche
AU - Treder, Maxi
AU - Janssen, Stefan
AU - Schild, Steven E.
AU - Holländer, Niels Henrik
AU - Gögenur, Ismail
N1 - Funding Information:
The study is part of the project InnoCan, which is funded by Interreg Deutschland-Danmark with funds from the European Regional Development Fund.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 International Institute of Anticancer Research. All rights reserved.
Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/12
Y1 - 2018/12
N2 - Background/Aim: The value of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for high rectal cancers is controversial. This study compared surgery plus neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy to surgery alone. Patients and Methods: Fifty-two patients with stage II/III high rectal cancers treated with surgery plus neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy were matched (1:4) to 208 patients treated with surgery alone. Matching criteria included age (≤65 vs. >65 years), gender and UICC-stage (II vs. III). These criteria were identical in all five patients used for each 1:4 matching. Both groups were compared for overall survival (OS). Results: On univariate analyses, age ≤65 years (p<0.001) was significantly associated with improved OS. A trend towards improved OS was found for neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (p=0.078) and UICC-stage II (p=0.060). On multivariate analysis, age (p<0.001) remained significant, and neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy showed a trend towards better OS (p=0.073). Conclusion: Given the limitations of this study, the results showed that neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy may improve OS in patients with stage II/III high rectal cancers. However, these results need to be verified in a prospective randomized trial.
AB - Background/Aim: The value of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for high rectal cancers is controversial. This study compared surgery plus neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy to surgery alone. Patients and Methods: Fifty-two patients with stage II/III high rectal cancers treated with surgery plus neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy were matched (1:4) to 208 patients treated with surgery alone. Matching criteria included age (≤65 vs. >65 years), gender and UICC-stage (II vs. III). These criteria were identical in all five patients used for each 1:4 matching. Both groups were compared for overall survival (OS). Results: On univariate analyses, age ≤65 years (p<0.001) was significantly associated with improved OS. A trend towards improved OS was found for neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (p=0.078) and UICC-stage II (p=0.060). On multivariate analysis, age (p<0.001) remained significant, and neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy showed a trend towards better OS (p=0.073). Conclusion: Given the limitations of this study, the results showed that neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy may improve OS in patients with stage II/III high rectal cancers. However, these results need to be verified in a prospective randomized trial.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057564469&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.21873/anticanres.13063
DO - 10.21873/anticanres.13063
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 30504404
AN - SCOPUS:85057564469
SN - 0250-7005
VL - 38
SP - 6877
EP - 6880
JO - Anticancer Research
JF - Anticancer Research
IS - 12
ER -