TY - JOUR
T1 - A core outcome set of measurement instruments for assessing effectiveness and efficacy of perioperative pain management
T2 - results of the international IMI-PainCare PROMPT Delphi consensus process
AU - IMI-PainCare PROMPT Consensus Panel
AU - Pogatzki-Zahn, Esther M
AU - De Lucia, Sarah
AU - Weinmann, Claudia
AU - Heitkamp, Hauke
AU - Hummelshoj, Lone
AU - Liedgens, Hiltrud
AU - Meissner, Winfried
AU - Vincent, Katy
AU - Vollert, Jan
AU - Zahn, Peter
AU - Kaiser, Ulrike
AU - Rosenberger, Daniela C
N1 - Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025/5
Y1 - 2025/5
N2 - BACKGROUND: Effective perioperative pain management is crucial to prevent patient suffering, delayed recovery, chronic postsurgical pain, and long-term opioid use. However, the heterogeneous use of outcomes in studies complicates evidence synthesis and might not accurately reflect the experiences of individual patients. We initiated a consensus process to establish a core outcome set (COS) of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in postoperative pain, building upon the earlier consensus on a COS of domains.METHODS: Potential PROMs were identified via systematic literature searches for the domains pain intensity (with subdomains at rest and during activity), physical function, self-efficacy, and adverse events, followed by appraisal of psychometric properties according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments methodology. Then, a consensus meeting was convened, followed by a Delphi process with an international, multiprofessional panel of stakeholders, including those with lived experience. A conclusive consensus meeting approved the final COS of PROMs.RESULTS: The final COS consists of one unidimensional numerical rating scale for assessing pain intensity on average, worst pain intensity, pain intensity at rest, and procedure-specific pain intensity during activity; one unidimensional scale for pain interfering with activities in bed; one procedure-specific scale for assessing physical function; the IMI-PainCare PROMPT adaptation of the Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale for assessing self-efficacy; and the IMI-PainCare PROMPT adaptation of the Opioid-Related Symptom Distress Scale for assessing adverse events.CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive use of a core outcome set will help harmonise outcome assessment, facilitate comparisons between studies, promote patient-centred research, and improve postoperative pain care.
AB - BACKGROUND: Effective perioperative pain management is crucial to prevent patient suffering, delayed recovery, chronic postsurgical pain, and long-term opioid use. However, the heterogeneous use of outcomes in studies complicates evidence synthesis and might not accurately reflect the experiences of individual patients. We initiated a consensus process to establish a core outcome set (COS) of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in postoperative pain, building upon the earlier consensus on a COS of domains.METHODS: Potential PROMs were identified via systematic literature searches for the domains pain intensity (with subdomains at rest and during activity), physical function, self-efficacy, and adverse events, followed by appraisal of psychometric properties according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments methodology. Then, a consensus meeting was convened, followed by a Delphi process with an international, multiprofessional panel of stakeholders, including those with lived experience. A conclusive consensus meeting approved the final COS of PROMs.RESULTS: The final COS consists of one unidimensional numerical rating scale for assessing pain intensity on average, worst pain intensity, pain intensity at rest, and procedure-specific pain intensity during activity; one unidimensional scale for pain interfering with activities in bed; one procedure-specific scale for assessing physical function; the IMI-PainCare PROMPT adaptation of the Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale for assessing self-efficacy; and the IMI-PainCare PROMPT adaptation of the Opioid-Related Symptom Distress Scale for assessing adverse events.CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive use of a core outcome set will help harmonise outcome assessment, facilitate comparisons between studies, promote patient-centred research, and improve postoperative pain care.
U2 - 10.1016/j.bja.2025.01.029
DO - 10.1016/j.bja.2025.01.029
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 40089403
SN - 0007-0912
VL - 134
SP - 1460
EP - 1473
JO - British Journal of Anaesthesia
JF - British Journal of Anaesthesia
IS - 5
ER -