TY - JOUR
T1 - 2022 American College of Rheumatology/EULAR Classification Criteria for Takayasu Arteritis
AU - for the DCVAS Study Group
AU - Grayson, Peter C.
AU - Ponte, Cristina
AU - Suppiah, Ravi
AU - Robson, Joanna C.
AU - Gribbons, Katherine Bates
AU - Judge, Andrew
AU - Craven, Anthea
AU - Khalid, Sara
AU - Hutchings, Andrew
AU - Danda, Debashish
AU - Luqmani, Raashid A.
AU - Watts, Richard A.
AU - Merkel, Peter A.
AU - Gatenby, Paul
AU - Hill, Catherine
AU - Ranganathan, Dwarakanathan
AU - Kronbichler, Andreas
AU - Blockmans, Daniel
AU - Barra, Lillian
AU - Carette, Simon
AU - Pagnoux, Christian
AU - Dhindsa, Navjot
AU - Fifi-Mah, Aurore
AU - Khalidi, Nader
AU - Liang, Patrick
AU - Milman, Nataliya
AU - Pineau, Christian
AU - Tian, Xinping
AU - Wang, Guochun
AU - Wang, Tian
AU - Zhao, Ming hui
AU - Tesar, Vladimir
AU - Baslund, Bo
AU - Hammam, Nevin
AU - Shahin, Amira
AU - Pirila, Laura
AU - Putaala, Jukka
AU - Hellmich, Bernhard
AU - Henes, Jörg
AU - Holle, Julia
AU - Lamprecht, Peter
AU - Moosig, Frank
AU - Neumann, Thomas
AU - Schmidt, Wolfgang
AU - Sunderkoettey, Cord
AU - Szekanecz, Zoltan
AU - Danda, Debashish
AU - Das, Siddharth
AU - Gupta, Rajiva
AU - Rajasekhar, Liza
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American College of Rheumatology.
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - Objective: To develop and validate new classification criteria for Takayasu arteritis (TAK). Methods: Patients with vasculitis or comparator diseases were recruited into an international cohort. The study proceeded in 6 phases: 1) identification of candidate criteria items, 2) collection of candidate items present at diagnosis, 3) expert panel review of cases, 4) data-driven reduction of candidate items, 5) derivation of a points-based classification score in a development data set, and 6) validation in an independent data set. Results: The development data set consisted of 316 cases of TAK and 323 comparators. The validation data set consisted of an additional 146 cases of TAK and 127 comparators. Age ≤60 years at diagnosis and imaging evidence of large-vessel vasculitis were absolute requirements to classify a patient as having TAK. The final criteria items and weights were as follows: female sex (+1), angina (+2), limb claudication (+2), arterial bruit (+2), reduced upper extremity pulse (+2), reduced pulse or tenderness of a carotid artery (+2), blood pressure difference between arms of ≥20 mm Hg (+1), number of affected arterial territories (+1 to +3), paired artery involvement (+1), and abdominal aorta plus renal or mesenteric involvement (+3). A patient could be classified as having TAK with a cumulative score of ≥5 points. When these criteria were tested in the validation data set, the model area under the curve was 0.97 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.94–0.99) with a sensitivity of 93.8% (95% CI 88.6–97.1%) and specificity of 99.2% (95% CI 96.7–100.0%). Conclusion: The 2022 American College of Rheumatology/EULAR classification criteria for TAK are now validated for use in research.
AB - Objective: To develop and validate new classification criteria for Takayasu arteritis (TAK). Methods: Patients with vasculitis or comparator diseases were recruited into an international cohort. The study proceeded in 6 phases: 1) identification of candidate criteria items, 2) collection of candidate items present at diagnosis, 3) expert panel review of cases, 4) data-driven reduction of candidate items, 5) derivation of a points-based classification score in a development data set, and 6) validation in an independent data set. Results: The development data set consisted of 316 cases of TAK and 323 comparators. The validation data set consisted of an additional 146 cases of TAK and 127 comparators. Age ≤60 years at diagnosis and imaging evidence of large-vessel vasculitis were absolute requirements to classify a patient as having TAK. The final criteria items and weights were as follows: female sex (+1), angina (+2), limb claudication (+2), arterial bruit (+2), reduced upper extremity pulse (+2), reduced pulse or tenderness of a carotid artery (+2), blood pressure difference between arms of ≥20 mm Hg (+1), number of affected arterial territories (+1 to +3), paired artery involvement (+1), and abdominal aorta plus renal or mesenteric involvement (+3). A patient could be classified as having TAK with a cumulative score of ≥5 points. When these criteria were tested in the validation data set, the model area under the curve was 0.97 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.94–0.99) with a sensitivity of 93.8% (95% CI 88.6–97.1%) and specificity of 99.2% (95% CI 96.7–100.0%). Conclusion: The 2022 American College of Rheumatology/EULAR classification criteria for TAK are now validated for use in research.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85141659320&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/art.42324
DO - 10.1002/art.42324
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 36349501
AN - SCOPUS:85141659320
SN - 2326-5191
VL - 74
SP - 1872
EP - 1880
JO - Arthritis and Rheumatology
JF - Arthritis and Rheumatology
IS - 12
ER -