Why is the principle of “as much radicality as needed, as much organ preservation as possible” only insufficiently implemented in daily practice in the surgical treatment of penile cancer patients?

Matthias May; Michael Rink; Axel S. Merseburger; Sabine D. Brookman-May

doi:10.21037/tau-20-1152

Why is the principle of “as much radicality as needed, as much organ preservation as possible” only insufficiently implemented in daily practice in the surgical treatment of penile cancer patients?

Matthias May^*, Michael Rink, Axel S. Merseburger, Sabine D. Brookman-May

^*Korrespondierende/r Autor/-in für diese Arbeit

Klinik für Urologie

4 Zitate (Scopus)

Originalsprache	Englisch
Zeitschrift	Translational Andrology and Urology
Jahrgang	9
Ausgabenummer	5
Seiten (von - bis)	1901-1903
Seitenumfang	3
ISSN	2223-4683
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-20-1152
Publikationsstatus	Veröffentlicht - 10.2020

UN SDGs

Dieser Output leistet einen Beitrag zu folgendem(n) Ziel(en) für nachhaltige Entwicklung

SDG 3 – Gesundheit und Wohlergehen

Strategische Forschungsbereiche und Zentren

Profilbereich: Lübeck Integrated Oncology Network (LION)

DFG-Fachsystematik

2.22-14 Hämatologie, Onkologie
2.22-23 Reproduktionsmedizin, Urologie

Dokumente

10.21037/tau-20-1152

Weitere Links

Zitieren

@article{01a1689cd50947fd9e5ee595971e8b4c,

title = "Why is the principle of “as much radicality as needed, as much organ preservation as possible” only insufficiently implemented in daily practice in the surgical treatment of penile cancer patients?",

author = "Matthias May and Michael Rink and Merseburger, \{Axel S.\} and Brookman-May, \{Sabine D.\}",

year = "2020",

month = oct,

doi = "10.21037/tau-20-1152",

language = "English",

volume = "9",

pages = "1901--1903",

journal = "Translational Andrology and Urology",

issn = "2223-4683",

publisher = "AME Publishing Company",

number = "5",