Why are psychiatric imaging methods clinically unreliable? Conclusions and practical guidelines for authors, editors and reviewers

Stefan Borgwardt; Joaquim Radua; Andrea Mechelli; Paolo Fusar-Poli

doi:10.1186/1744-9081-8-46

Why are psychiatric imaging methods clinically unreliable? Conclusions and practical guidelines for authors, editors and reviewers

Stefan Borgwardt^*, Joaquim Radua, Andrea Mechelli, Paolo Fusar-Poli

^*Korrespondierende/r Autor/-in für diese Arbeit

Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie

29 Zitate (Scopus)

Abstract

No reliable anatomical or functional alterations have been confirmed in psychiatric neuroimaging; however it can become reliable with translational impact on clinical practice when considering crucial methodological issues. We provide guidelines to authors, editors and reviewers in the implementation/evaluation of neuroimaging studies to bend neuroimaging to be more than basic neuroscience.

Originalsprache	Englisch
Aufsatznummer	46
Zeitschrift	Behavioral and Brain Functions
Jahrgang	8
ISSN	1744-9081
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-8-46
Publikationsstatus	Veröffentlicht - 01.09.2012

UN SDGs

Dieser Output leistet einen Beitrag zu folgendem(n) Ziel(en) für nachhaltige Entwicklung

SDG 3 – Gesundheit und Wohlergehen
SDG 10 – Weniger Ungleichheiten

Dokumente

10.1186/1744-9081-8-46

Weitere Links

Link to publication in Scopus

Zitieren

@article{aff0ba2dd97a4a1583880323a60d629e,

title = "Why are psychiatric imaging methods clinically unreliable? Conclusions and practical guidelines for authors, editors and reviewers",

abstract = "No reliable anatomical or functional alterations have been confirmed in psychiatric neuroimaging; however it can become reliable with translational impact on clinical practice when considering crucial methodological issues. We provide guidelines to authors, editors and reviewers in the implementation/evaluation of neuroimaging studies to bend neuroimaging to be more than basic neuroscience.",

author = "Stefan Borgwardt and Joaquim Radua and Andrea Mechelli and Paolo Fusar-Poli",

year = "2012",

month = sep,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1186/1744-9081-8-46",

language = "English",

volume = "8",

journal = "Behavioral and Brain Functions",

issn = "1744-9081",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why are psychiatric imaging methods clinically unreliable? Conclusions and practical guidelines for authors, editors and reviewers

AU - Borgwardt, Stefan

AU - Radua, Joaquim

AU - Mechelli, Andrea

AU - Fusar-Poli, Paolo

PY - 2012/9/1

Y1 - 2012/9/1

N2 - No reliable anatomical or functional alterations have been confirmed in psychiatric neuroimaging; however it can become reliable with translational impact on clinical practice when considering crucial methodological issues. We provide guidelines to authors, editors and reviewers in the implementation/evaluation of neuroimaging studies to bend neuroimaging to be more than basic neuroscience.

AB - No reliable anatomical or functional alterations have been confirmed in psychiatric neuroimaging; however it can become reliable with translational impact on clinical practice when considering crucial methodological issues. We provide guidelines to authors, editors and reviewers in the implementation/evaluation of neuroimaging studies to bend neuroimaging to be more than basic neuroscience.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84865540917

U2 - 10.1186/1744-9081-8-46

DO - 10.1186/1744-9081-8-46

M3 - Comments/Debates

C2 - 22938624

AN - SCOPUS:84865540917

SN - 1744-9081

VL - 8

JO - Behavioral and Brain Functions

JF - Behavioral and Brain Functions

M1 - 46

ER -

Why are psychiatric imaging methods clinically unreliable? Conclusions and practical guidelines for authors, editors and reviewers

Abstract

UN SDGs

Dokumente

Weitere Links

Fingerprint

Zitieren