Why are psychiatric imaging methods clinically unreliable? Conclusions and practical guidelines for authors, editors and reviewers

Stefan Borgwardt*, Joaquim Radua, Andrea Mechelli, Paolo Fusar-Poli

*Korrespondierende/r Autor/-in für diese Arbeit
26 Zitate (Scopus)

Abstract

No reliable anatomical or functional alterations have been confirmed in psychiatric neuroimaging; however it can become reliable with translational impact on clinical practice when considering crucial methodological issues. We provide guidelines to authors, editors and reviewers in the implementation/evaluation of neuroimaging studies to bend neuroimaging to be more than basic neuroscience.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer46
ZeitschriftBehavioral and Brain Functions
Jahrgang8
ISSN1744-9081
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 01.09.2012

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Why are psychiatric imaging methods clinically unreliable? Conclusions and practical guidelines for authors, editors and reviewers“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Zitieren