Abstract
Purpose: For two types of passively visualizable magnetic resonance (MR)-compatible needles, the size of susceptibility artifacts was investigated at 0.2 and 1.5 Tesla (T) and assessed regarding their suitability for needle visualization. Methods: Phantom trials were performed using T1-weighted spin echo (SE), turbospin echo (TSE) and gradient echo (GE) sequences and different angles β between the needles and the main magnetic field (B0). Results: Depending on the needle angle β and the applied pulse sequence, we found artifact diameters of 0-9.7 mm employing SE, of 1.7-9.4 mm employing TSE, and of 1.4-20.6 mm employing GE at 1.5 T. At 0.2 T, we found artifact diameters of 0-5.7 mm employing SE, of 0-6.3 mm employing TSE, and of 0- 11.3 mm employing GE. Conclusion: Comparing artifact sizes at 1.5 T and 0.2 T, low field strength is superior for passive visualization of the needles tested-especially if GE imaging is performed.
| Originalsprache | Englisch |
|---|---|
| Zeitschrift | CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology |
| Jahrgang | 19 |
| Ausgabenummer | 5 |
| Seiten (von - bis) | 335-340 |
| Seitenumfang | 6 |
| ISSN | 0174-1551 |
| DOIs | |
| Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 01.01.1996 |
UN SDGs
Dieser Output leistet einen Beitrag zu folgendem(n) Ziel(en) für nachhaltige Entwicklung
-
SDG 3 – Gesundheit und Wohlergehen
-
SDG 9 – Industrie, Innovation und Infrastruktur
Fingerprint
Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Visualization of magnetic resonance-compatible needles at 1.5 and 0.2 Tesla“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.Zitieren
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver