Zur Hauptnavigation wechseln Zur Suche wechseln Zum Hauptinhalt wechseln

Ulipristal acetate versus leuprolide acetate for uterine fibroids

  • Jacques Donnez*
  • , Janusz Tomaszewski
  • , Francisco Vázquez
  • , Philippe Bouchard
  • , Boguslav Lemieszczuk
  • , Francesco Baró
  • , Kazem Nouri
  • , Luigi Selvaggi
  • , Krzysztof Sodowski
  • , Elke Bestel
  • , Paul Terrill
  • , Ian Osterloh
  • , Ernest Loumaye
  • , Klaus Diedrich
  • *Korrespondierende/r Autor/-in für diese Arbeit
  • Université Catholique de Louvain
  • Prywatna Klinika Polozniczo-Ginekologiczna
  • Clinica Ginecologica El Centro de Estudios de Obstetricia y Ginecología Asociado
  • Pierre and Marie Curie University (UPMC, Paris 6)and Medical School
  • Gabinet Lekarski Specjalistyczny Sonus
  • Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Universitari Vall d'Hebrón
  • University of Vienna
  • Clinica Ostetrica e Ginecologica II
  • Aldo Moro University of Bari
  • Centrum Medyczne Krzysztof Sodowski
  • Preglem
  • MDSL International Ltd
  • OsterMed Ltd.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and side-effect profile of ulipristal acetate as compared with those of leuprolide acetate for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids before surgery are unclear. METHODS: In this double-blind noninferiority trial, we randomly assigned 307 patients with symptomatic fibroids and excessive uterine bleeding to receive 3 months of daily therapy with oral ulipristal acetate (at a dose of either 5 mg or 10 mg) or once-monthly intramuscular injections of leuprolide acetate (at a dose of 3.75 mg). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with controlled bleeding at week 13, with a prespecified noninferiority margin of -20%. RESULTS: Uterine bleeding was controlled in 90% of patients receiving 5 mg of ulipristal acetate, in 98% of those receiving 10 mg of ulipristal acetate, and in 89% of those receiving leuprolide acetate, for differences (as compared with leuprolide acetate) of 1.2 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], -9.3 to 11.8) for 5 mg of ulipristal acetate and 8.8 percentage points (95% CI, 0.4 to 18.3) for 10 mg of ulipristal acetate. Median times to amenorrhea were 7 days for patients receiving 5 mg of ulipristal acetate, 5 days for those receiving 10 mg of ulipristal acetate, and 21 days for those receiving leuprolide acetate. Moderate-to-severe hot flashes were reported for 11% of patients receiving 5 mg of ulipristal acetate, for 10% of those receiving 10 mg of ulipristal acetate, and for 40% of those receiving leuprolide acetate (P<0.001 for each dose of ulipristal acetate vs. leuprolide acetate). CONCLUSIONS: Both the 5-mg and 10-mg daily doses of ulipristal acetate were noninferior to oncemonthly leuprolide acetate in controlling uterine bleeding and were significantly less likely to cause hot flashes. (Funded by PregLem; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00740831.)

OriginalspracheEnglisch
ZeitschriftNew England Journal of Medicine
Jahrgang366
Ausgabenummer5
Seiten (von - bis)421-432
Seitenumfang12
ISSN0028-4793
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 02.02.2012

UN SDGs

Dieser Output leistet einen Beitrag zu folgendem(n) Ziel(en) für nachhaltige Entwicklung

  1. SDG 3 – Gesundheit und Wohlergehen
    SDG 3 – Gesundheit und Wohlergehen

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Ulipristal acetate versus leuprolide acetate for uterine fibroids“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Dieses zitieren