Zur Hauptnavigation wechseln Zur Suche wechseln Zum Hauptinhalt wechseln

Two-year follow-up after treatment with the cognitive behavioral analysis system of psychotherapy versus supportive psychotherapy for early-onset chronic depression

Elisabeth Schramm*, Levente Kriston, Moritz Elsaesser, Thomas Fangmeier, Ramona Meister, Paul Bausch, Ingo Zobel, Josef Bailer, Katrin Wambach, Matthias Backenstrass, Jan Philipp Klein, Dieter Schoepf, Knut Schnell, Antje Gumz, Bernd Lowe, Henrik Walter, Markus Wolf, Katharina Domschke, Mathias Berger, Martin HautzingerMartin Harter

*Korrespondierende/r Autor/-in für diese Arbeit

Abstract

Background: Evidence on the long-term efficacy of psychotherapeutic approaches for chronic depression is scarce. Objective: To evaluate the effects of the Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) compared to Supportive Psychotherapy (SP) 1 year and 2 years after treatment termination. Methods: In this study, we present 1- and 2-year follow-up assessments of a prospective, multicenter, evaluator-blinded, randomized clinical trial of outpatients with early-onset chronic major depression (n = 268). The initial treatment included 32 sessions of CBASP or SP over 48 weeks. The primary outcome was the rate of "well weeks" (Longitudinal Interval Follow-Up Evaluation; no/minimal symptoms) after 1 year and 2 years. The secondary outcomes were, among others, clinician- and self-rated depressive symptoms, response/remission rates, and quality of life. Results: Of the 268 randomized patients, 207 (77%) participated in the follow-up. In the intention-to-treat analysis, there was no statistically significant difference between CBASP and SP patients in experiencing well weeks (CBASP: mean [SD] of 48.6 [36.9] weeks; SP: 39.0 [34.8]; rate ratio 1.26, 95% CI 0.99-1.59, p = 0.057, d = 0.18) and in remission rates (CBASP: 1 year 40%, 2 years 40.2%; SP: 1 year 28.9%, 2 years 33%) in the 2 years after treatment. Statistically significant effects were found in favor of CBASP 1 year after treatment termination regarding the rate of well weeks, self-rated depressive symptoms, and depression-related quality of life. Conclusions: CBASP lost its superiority over SP at some point between the first and the second year. This suggests the necessity of maintenance treatment for early-onset chronically depressed patients remitted with CBASP during the acute therapy phase, as well as the sequential integration of other treatment strategies, including medication for those who did not reach remission.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
ZeitschriftPsychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Jahrgang88
Ausgabenummer3
Seiten (von - bis)154-164
Seitenumfang11
ISSN0033-3190
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 01.06.2019

UN SDGs

Dieser Output leistet einen Beitrag zu folgendem(n) Ziel(en) für nachhaltige Entwicklung

  1. SDG 3 – Gesundheit und Wohlergehen
    SDG 3 – Gesundheit und Wohlergehen
  2. SDG 10 – Weniger Ungleichheiten
    SDG 10 – Weniger Ungleichheiten

Strategische Forschungsbereiche und Zentren

  • Forschungsschwerpunkt: Gehirn, Hormone, Verhalten - Center for Brain, Behavior and Metabolism (CBBM)

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Two-year follow-up after treatment with the cognitive behavioral analysis system of psychotherapy versus supportive psychotherapy for early-onset chronic depression“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Zitieren