TY - JOUR
T1 - Trends in net survival from 15 cancers in six European Latin countries
T2 - The SUDCAN population-based study material
AU - GRELL EUROCARE-5 Working Group
AU - Crocetti, Emanuele
AU - Bossard, Nadine
AU - Uhry, Zoe
AU - Roche, Laurent
AU - Rossi, Silvia
AU - Capocaccia, Riccardo
AU - Faivre, Jean
AU - Van Eycken, E.
AU - Henau, K.
AU - Velten, M.
AU - Bouvier, V.
AU - Launoy, G.
AU - Bouvier, A. M.
AU - Woronoff, A. S.
AU - Robaszkiewicz, M.
AU - Tretarre, B.
AU - Colonna, M.
AU - Molinié, F.
AU - Bara, S.
AU - Lapôtre-Ledoux, B.
AU - Grosclaude, P.
AU - Brenner, H.
AU - Katalinic, A.
AU - Mazzoleni, G.
AU - Bulatko, A.
AU - Buzzoni, C.
AU - Giacomin, A.
AU - Ferretti, S.
AU - Barchielli, A.
AU - Manneschi, G.
AU - Gatta, G.
AU - Sant, M.
AU - Amash, H.
AU - Amati, C.
AU - Baili, P.
AU - Berrino, F.
AU - Bonfarnuzzo, S.
AU - Botta, L.
AU - Di Salvo, F.
AU - Foschi, R.
AU - Margutti, C.
AU - Meneghini, E.
AU - Minicozzi, P.
AU - Trama, A.
AU - Serraino, D.
AU - Zucchetto, A.
AU - De Angelis, R.
AU - Caldora, M.
AU - Carrani, E.
AU - Francisci, S.
PY - 2017/1/1
Y1 - 2017/1/1
N2 - The aim of the SUDCAN collaborative study was to compare the net survival from 15 cancers diagnosed in 2000-2004 in six European Latin countries and provide trends in net survival and dynamics of excess mortality rates up to 5 years after diagnosis from 1992 to 2004 in France, Italy, Spain, and Switzerland, and from 2000 to 2004 in Belgium and Portugal. This paper presents a detailed description of the data analyzed and quality indicators. Incident cases from Belgium, France, Italy, Portugal, Spain, and Switzerland were retrieved from 56 general or specialized population-based cancer registries that participated in the EUROCARE-5 database. Fifteen cancer sites were analyzed. The data were checked according to the EUROCARE protocol. The percentages of excluded cases, cases based on death-certificate only, cases lost to follow-up at 5 years after diagnosis, and the proportions of microscopically verified cases were evaluated across countries and cancer sites. Data exclusions for major flaws were negligible. Cases based on death-certificate only were quite rare, except for some poor-prognosis cancers in some countries. The site-specific proportions of microscopically verified cases were generally high, but slightly lower in Italy than elsewhere. The percentage of cases lost to follow-up at 5 years after diagnosis was generally low. The net survival analyses in 2000-2004 included 873 314 tumors, whereas trend analyses included 1 426 004 tumors. The quality of the data analyzed was generally good. In fact, the analyzed data have been already checked and accepted for EUROCARE-5. However, slight differences in quality indexes, for some cancers, should be kept in mind in the interpretation of survival comparisons across countries.
AB - The aim of the SUDCAN collaborative study was to compare the net survival from 15 cancers diagnosed in 2000-2004 in six European Latin countries and provide trends in net survival and dynamics of excess mortality rates up to 5 years after diagnosis from 1992 to 2004 in France, Italy, Spain, and Switzerland, and from 2000 to 2004 in Belgium and Portugal. This paper presents a detailed description of the data analyzed and quality indicators. Incident cases from Belgium, France, Italy, Portugal, Spain, and Switzerland were retrieved from 56 general or specialized population-based cancer registries that participated in the EUROCARE-5 database. Fifteen cancer sites were analyzed. The data were checked according to the EUROCARE protocol. The percentages of excluded cases, cases based on death-certificate only, cases lost to follow-up at 5 years after diagnosis, and the proportions of microscopically verified cases were evaluated across countries and cancer sites. Data exclusions for major flaws were negligible. Cases based on death-certificate only were quite rare, except for some poor-prognosis cancers in some countries. The site-specific proportions of microscopically verified cases were generally high, but slightly lower in Italy than elsewhere. The percentage of cases lost to follow-up at 5 years after diagnosis was generally low. The net survival analyses in 2000-2004 included 873 314 tumors, whereas trend analyses included 1 426 004 tumors. The quality of the data analyzed was generally good. In fact, the analyzed data have been already checked and accepted for EUROCARE-5. However, slight differences in quality indexes, for some cancers, should be kept in mind in the interpretation of survival comparisons across countries.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85010222366&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000300
DO - 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000300
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 28005599
AN - SCOPUS:85010222366
SN - 0959-8278
VL - 26
SP - S3-S8
JO - European Journal of Cancer Prevention
JF - European Journal of Cancer Prevention
ER -