Treatment costs for advanced prostate cancer using luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists: A solid biodegradable leuprorelin implant versus other formulations

Axel S. Merseburger, Thomas Björk, James Whitehouse, Davide Meani*

*Korrespondierende/r Autor/-in für diese Arbeit
8 Zitate (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: To compare treatment costs with alternative luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist preparations and determine whether a leuprorelin solid implant is associated with potential cost savings. Patients & methods: A hypothetical population of 1000 prostate cancer patients was apportioned between the three most commonly-prescribed LHRH agonist preparations. Differentiated annual costs for 1- and 3-monthly formulations were calculated for France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the UK (EU5) and Sweden, and compared with the leuprorelin solid implant. Results: Compared with alternative formulations, leuprorelin solid implants had potential annual cost savings/1000 patients of €353,000 (EU5) and €699,000 (Sweden; 1-month formulations), and €259,000 (EU5) and €300,000 (Sweden; 3-month formulations). Conclusion: The leuprorelin solid implant was associated with potential cost savings compared with the most commonly used LHRH agonist preparations.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
ZeitschriftJournal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
Jahrgang4
Ausgabenummer5
Seiten (von - bis)447-453
Seitenumfang7
ISSN2042-6305
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 09.2015

Strategische Forschungsbereiche und Zentren

  • Profilbereich: Lübeck Integrated Oncology Network (LION)

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Treatment costs for advanced prostate cancer using luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists: A solid biodegradable leuprorelin implant versus other formulations“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Zitieren