Zur Hauptnavigation wechseln Zur Suche wechseln Zum Hauptinhalt wechseln

Topotecan plus carboplatin versus standard therapy with paclitaxel plus carboplatin (PC) or gemcitabine plus carboplatin (GC) or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin plus carboplatin (PLDC): A randomized phase III trial of the NOGGO-AGO-Study Group-AGO Austria and GEICOENGOT- GCIG intergroup study (HECTOR)

Jalid Sehouli*, R. Chekerov, A. Reinthaller, R. Richter, A. Gonzalez-Martin, P. Harter, H. Woopen, E. Petru, L. C. Hanker, E. Keil, P. Wimberger, P. Klare, C. Kurzeder, F. Hilpert, A. K. Belau, A. Zeimet, I. Bover-Barcelo, U. Canzler, S. Mahner, W. Meier

*Korrespondierende/r Autor/-in für diese Arbeit

Abstract

Background: Randomized, phase III trial to evaluate safety and efficacy of topotecan and carboplatin (TC) compared with standard platinum-based combinations in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC). Patients and methods: Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the experimental TC arm (topotecan 0.75 mg/m2/days 1-3 and carboplatin AUC 5 on day 3 every 3 weeks) or to one of the standard regimes [(PC) paclitaxel plus carboplatin; (GC) gemcitabine plus carboplatin; (PLDC) pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and carboplatin] which could be chosen by individual preference but before randomization. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) after 12 months. Overall survival (OS), response rate, toxicity, quality of life and treatment preference regarding standard treatment were defined as secondary end points. Results: A total of 550 patients were recruited. The PFS rate after 12 months was 37.0% for TC compared with 40.2% in the standard combinations (P = 0.470). The overall response rate was 73.1% for TC versus 75.1% for standard combinations (P = 0.149). After a median follow-up of 20 months, the median PFS was 10 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 9.4-10.6] and did not differ between both arms (P = 0.414). The median OS was 25 months in the TC arm versus 31 months in the standard arm (95% CI: 22.4-27.6 resp. 26.0-36.0; P = 0.163). Severe hematologic toxicities (grade 3/4) were rare in the experimental arm (P < 0.001), with 17.4% leucopenia, 27.8% neutropenia and 15.9% thrombopenia. Conclusion: The combination of carboplatin and topotecan was well tolerated with significant lower rates of severe hematological toxicities but did not improve PFS or OS in platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer compared with established standard regimens.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
ZeitschriftAnnals of Oncology
Jahrgang27
Ausgabenummer12
Seiten (von - bis)2236-2241
Seitenumfang6
ISSN0923-7534
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 12.2016

Fördermittel

HW is participant in the Charité Clinical Scientist Program funded by the Charité Universit€atsmedizin Berlin and the Berlin Institute of Health. The remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest. Research Grant from GlaxoSmithKline and AMGEN (no grant number applied).

UN SDGs

Dieser Output leistet einen Beitrag zu folgendem(n) Ziel(en) für nachhaltige Entwicklung

  1. SDG 3 – Gesundheit und Wohlergehen
    SDG 3 – Gesundheit und Wohlergehen

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Topotecan plus carboplatin versus standard therapy with paclitaxel plus carboplatin (PC) or gemcitabine plus carboplatin (GC) or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin plus carboplatin (PLDC): A randomized phase III trial of the NOGGO-AGO-Study Group-AGO Austria and GEICOENGOT- GCIG intergroup study (HECTOR)“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Zitieren