To Calibrate or not to Calibrate? A Methodological Dilemma in Experimental Pain Research

Waclaw M. Adamczyk*, Tibor M. Szikszay, Hadas Nahman-Averbuch, Jacek Skalski, Jakub Nastaj, Philip Gouverneur, Kerstin Luedtke

*Korrespondierende/r Autor/-in für diese Arbeit
7 Zitate (Scopus)

Abstract

To calibrate or not to calibrate? This question is raised by almost everyone designing an experimental pain study with supra-threshold stimulation. The dilemma is whether to individualize stimulus intensity to the pain threshold / supra-threshold pain level of each participant or whether to provide the noxious stimulus at a fixed intensity so that everyone receives the identical input. Each approach has unique pros and cons which need to be considered to i) accurately design an experiment, ii) enhance statistical inference in the given data and, iii) reduce bias and the influence of confounding factors in the individual study e.g., body composition, differences in energy absorption and previous experience. Individualization requires calibration, a procedure already irritating the nociceptive system but allowing to match the pain level across individuals. It leads to a higher variability of the stimulus intensity, thereby influencing the encoding of “noxiousness” by the central nervous system. Results might be less influenced by statistical phenomena such as ceiling/floor effects and the approach does not seem to rise ethical concerns. On the other hand, applying a fixed (standardized) intensity reduces the problem of intensity encoding leading to a large between-subjects variability in pain responses. Fixed stimulation intensities do not require pre-exposure. It can be proposed that one method is not preferable over another, however the choice depends on the study aim and the desired level of external validity. This paper discusses considerations for choosing the optimal approach for experimental pain studies and provides recommendations for different study designs. Perspective: To calibrate pain or not? This dilemma is related to almost every experimental pain research. The decision is a trade-off between statistical power and greater control of stimulus encoding. The article decomposes both approaches and presents the pros and cons of either approach supported by data and simulation experiment.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
ZeitschriftJournal of Pain
Jahrgang23
Ausgabenummer11
Seiten (von - bis)1823-1832
Seitenumfang10
ISSN1526-5900
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 11.2022

Strategische Forschungsbereiche und Zentren

  • Querschnittsbereich: Gesundheitswissenschaften: Logopädie, Ergotherapie, Physiotherapie und Hebammenwissenschaft

DFG-Fachsystematik

  • 205-04 Physiologie
  • 206-05 Experimentelle Modelle zum Verständnis von Erkrankungen des Nervensystems
  • 206-03 Experimentelle und theoretische Netzwerk-Neurowissenschaften

Zitieren