Zur Hauptnavigation wechseln Zur Suche wechseln Zum Hauptinhalt wechseln

The Safety and Effectiveness of the Contour Neurovascular System (Contour) for the Treatment of Bifurcation Aneurysms: The CERUS Study

Thomas Liebig*, Monika Killer-Oberpfalzer, Gyula Gal, Peter Schramm, Ansgar Berlis, Franziska Dorn, Olav Jansen, Jens Fiehler, Fritz Wodarg

*Korrespondierende/r Autor/-in für diese Arbeit

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Contour is a novel intra-aneurysmal flow disrupting device to treat intracranial aneurysms. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Contour device for treatment of nonruptured intracranial bifurcation aneurysms through a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study. METHODS: Thirty-four patients were enrolled. Primary end points were successful occlusion at 6 mo for efficacy and any major stroke or nonaccidental death up to 30 d or major disabling stroke within 6 mo for safety. Secondary end points were occlusion at 12 mo, retreatment rate, procedure time, and procedure-related/device-related adverse events. Procedural and follow-up imaging was reviewed by an independent core laboratory. Adverse events were reviewed and adjudicated by a clinical events committee. RESULTS: In total, 32 of 34 aneurysms were successfully implanted and, 2 of 34 in the intention-to-treat (ITT) group did not receive the Contour and were excluded from follow-up after 30 d. In addition, 2 of 32 were lost to angiographic follow-up and regarded as treatment failure. The primary safety end point was met in 2 patients in the ITT group. In the perprotocol (PP) group, complete occlusion was seen in 14 of 32 (44%) at 6 mo and 22 of 32 (69%) at 12 mo. Adequate occlusion (Raymond-Roy [RR] 1 and 2) was reached in 84% at a last available follow-up. One patient from the ITT group and 1 from the PP group received additional treatment during follow-up. CONCLUSION: The Contour seems to be both safe and effective in the treatment of intracranial bifurcation aneurysms.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
ZeitschriftNeurosurgery
Jahrgang90
Ausgabenummer3
Seiten (von - bis)270-277
Seitenumfang8
ISSN0148-396X
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 01.03.2022

Fördermittel

Dr Liebig proctors and consults for Cerus Endovascular outside this study, and within the past 3 yr, he has proctored or received service-related fees from MicroVention, Sequent, Phenox, Stryker, Medtronic, and Pfizer. Dr Fiehler receives research support from EU, BMBF, BMWi, DFG, Acandis, Medtronic, MicroVention, and Stryker and holds an executive function at Eppdata and stock in Tegus. He consults for Acandis, Cerenovus, Medtronic, MicroVention, Penumbra, Phenox, and Stryker. Dr Jansen receives research support from BMBF and DFG. During the past 3 yr, he consulted for Acandis, Cerenovus, Cerus Endovascular, MicroVention, Philips, Radiologie Holding, Route 92, and Stryker. Dr Berlis has no conflicts with Cerus Endovascular outside this study, and within past 3 yr, he has proctored or received service-related fees from MicroVention (proctor), Sequent Medical (proctor), Phenox (lecture honorary, CEC), Stryker (proctor, lecture honorary), and Penumbra (lecture honorary). Dr Killer-Oberpfalzer consults for Cerus Endovascular outside this study, and within the past 3 yr, she has received service-related fees from MicroVention, Medtronic, and Stryker. Dr Wodarg proctors and consults for Cerus Endovascular outside this study, and within the past 3 yr, he has proctored or received service-related fees from MicroVention, Acandis, Cerenovus, Route 92, and Daiichi Sankyo. Dr Dorn receives research support from Cerenovus and proctors and consults for Cerus Endovascular outside this study, and within the past 3 yr, she has proctored or received service-related fees from Phenox, Cerenovus, Acandis and Balt Germany. Dr Schramm receives research support from Siemens and Penumbra, consults for Cerus Endovascular, and within the past 3 yr, he has proctored or received service-related fees from Penumbra, Phenox, and Stryker. Dr Gal proctors for Cerus Endovascular.

UN SDGs

Dieser Output leistet einen Beitrag zu folgendem(n) Ziel(en) für nachhaltige Entwicklung

  1. SDG 3 – Gesundheit und Wohlergehen
    SDG 3 – Gesundheit und Wohlergehen

Strategische Forschungsbereiche und Zentren

  • Forschungsschwerpunkt: Gehirn, Hormone, Verhalten - Center for Brain, Behavior and Metabolism (CBBM)

DFG-Fachsystematik

  • 2.23-07 Klinische Neurologie, Neurochirurgie und Neuroradiologie

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „The Safety and Effectiveness of the Contour Neurovascular System (Contour) for the Treatment of Bifurcation Aneurysms: The CERUS Study“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Zitieren