Abstract
Even though modern surgical techniques are dominating reconstructive facial procedures, the capability to use facial epitheses for reconstruction is still an important skill for the maxillofacial surgeon. We present an international multicenter analysis to clarify which techniques are used to fixate facial prostheses. We contacted all maxillofacial departments in Germany, Austria, Switzerland and Norway which were registered with the German society for oral and maxillofacial surgery (DGMKG). These centers were asked via electronical mail to provide information on the type of epithesis fixation systems currently in use. The return rate from 58 departments was 43.1% (n = 25). Overall, implant fixation was the preferred fixation system (92%). Plates were the second most common fixation technique (32%). No centers reported the standard use of non-invasive fixation techniques for permanent epithesis fixation. The main retention systems in use were magnets (24/25), other retention systems are used much less often. The current preferred fixation technique for facial epitheses consists of implant-based, magnet-fixated epitheses. For nasal prostheses, a plate-based, magnet-fixated system is often used.
| Originalsprache | Englisch |
|---|---|
| Zeitschrift | Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery |
| Jahrgang | 43 |
| Ausgabenummer | 7 |
| Seiten (von - bis) | 1038-1041 |
| Seitenumfang | 4 |
| ISSN | 1010-5182 |
| DOIs | |
| Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 01.09.2015 |
UN SDGs
Dieser Output leistet einen Beitrag zu folgendem(n) Ziel(en) für nachhaltige Entwicklung
-
SDG 3 – Gesundheit und Wohlergehen
DFG-Fachsystematik
- 2.22-28 Zahnheilkunde; Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie
KDSF-Klassifikation für Forschungsfelder
- 910 - Leben und Wohlergehen - Allgemein
Fingerprint
Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „The current state of facial prosthetics - A multicenter analysis“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.Zitieren
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver