Zur Hauptnavigation wechseln Zur Suche wechseln Zum Hauptinhalt wechseln

Sub-optimal therapy of patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) in the real-life stetting of the German PBC cohort

Titel in Übersetzung: Sub-optimale Behandlung von Patienten mit Prim r Bili rer Cholangitis (PBC) im klinischen Alltag der deutschen PBC Kohorte

Johannes Wiegand*, Annegret Franke, Tobias Müller, Kerstin Stein, Heike Bantel, Rainer Günther, Gerald Denk, Philipp A. Reuken, Jörn M. Schattenberg, Uwe Naumann, Tobias Böttler, Andreas Weber, Stefan Zeuzem, Matthias Hinz, Robin Greinert, Christoph Berg, Thaddäus Till Wissniowski, Karl Georg Simon, Jonel Trebicka, Rüdiger BehrensHarald Grümmer, Wolf Peter Hofmann, Nektarios Dikopoulos, Christoph Sarrazin, Elke Roeb, Andreas E. Kremer, Marion Muche, Marc Ringelhan, Andreas Teufel, Patrick Michl, Verena Keitel, Jens U. Marquardt, Achim Kautz, Frank Tacke, Katja Piotrowski, Nicole Köppe-Bauernfeind, Christian Trautwein, Thomas Berg

*Korrespondierende/r Autor/-in für diese Arbeit

Abstract

Background Real-world data on the management of patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) are so far scarce in Germany. Therefore, we aimed to establish a nationwide registry and describe the clinical characteristics and therapy of PBC patients. Methods Three different cohorts defined as ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) responders, as inadequate responders according to Paris II criteria, and as newly diagnosed patients were prospectively recruited. This manuscript includes the baseline data of the project. Results In total, 33/77 (43%) contacted centres (58% of university hospitals, 38% of non-university hospitals, and 24% of private practices) recruited 515 patients including 204 UDCA responders, 221 inadequate responders to UDCA, and 90 newly diagnosed patients. All patients were treated with UDCA; however, a UDCA dosage below the recommended dosage of 13 mg/kg/d was observed in 38.5% of individuals after 12 months of treatment. UDCA dosages were lower in nonacademic compared to academic centres. Only 75/219 (38.5%) of inadequate responders to UDCA received a second-line therapy with obeticholic acid (OCA) and/or bezafibrate (BZF). OCA (13% vs. 4.5%) and BZF (14% vs. 6.5%) were significantly more often prescribed by academic vs. nonacademic centres. Pruritus (27% vs. 15.5%), fatigue (23% vs. 4.5%), and sicca syndrome (14% vs. 1%) were significantly more often reported by academic centres. Conclusion The German PBC registry could be established, which indicates suboptimal therapy in a relevant proportion of patients and shows significant differences between academic and nonacademic centres. Results are fundamental to improving clinical management at different levels of care.

Titel in ÜbersetzungSub-optimale Behandlung von Patienten mit Prim r Bili rer Cholangitis (PBC) im klinischen Alltag der deutschen PBC Kohorte
OriginalspracheEnglisch
ZeitschriftZeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie
Jahrgang62
Ausgabenummer11
Seiten (von - bis)1931-1942
Seitenumfang12
ISSN0044-2771
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 01.11.2024

Fördermittel

The German PBC Cohort was supported by an unrestricted research grant from Intercept/Advanz Pharma to T.B.

TrägerTrägernummer
Intercept Pharmaceuticals
Advanz Pharma

    UN SDGs

    Dieser Output leistet einen Beitrag zu folgendem(n) Ziel(en) für nachhaltige Entwicklung

    1. SDG 3 – Gesundheit und Wohlergehen
      SDG 3 – Gesundheit und Wohlergehen

    Fingerprint

    Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Sub-optimale Behandlung von Patienten mit Prim r Bili rer Cholangitis (PBC) im klinischen Alltag der deutschen PBC Kohorte“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

    Zitieren